2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural response of fire-exposed cross-laminated timber beams under sustained loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be used in different structural components, such as large span floors [14]. CLT buildings are normally considered to have better structural performance and this is supported by a large amount of research [15]. Some researchers also focus on enhancing the mechanical properties of CLT or using different materials in lamina [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used in different structural components, such as large span floors [14]. CLT buildings are normally considered to have better structural performance and this is supported by a large amount of research [15]. Some researchers also focus on enhancing the mechanical properties of CLT or using different materials in lamina [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fire testing method was widely questioned by the fire safety science community in the past. [13][14][15][16] One of the main problems identified is with the differences in the fire growth observed in different compartments that are not represented by the method. As explained in Drysdale, 17 different wall materials significantly affect the compartment fire, including its growth rate and severity.…”
Section: Some Recognised Issues With the Standard Fire Exposure Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fire testing method was widely questioned by the fire safety science community in the past . One of the main problems identified is with the differences in the fire growth observed in different compartments that are not represented by the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexural strength of the CLT was determined using bending tests to failure, performed by the authors in accordance with BS EN 16351 [27]. For a failure mode consisting of tensile rupture in the outer lamella parallel to the grain, the average strength was found to be 35 N/mm 2 ±2 N/mm 2 [28,29]. Similarly, the elastic modulus orthogonal to the grain direction was found to be 335 N/mm 2 , whereas it was determined to be 10,050 N/mm 2 parallel to the grain [28].…”
Section: Experimental Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%