2008
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m706004200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Requirements for Multimerization of the Pathogen Receptor Dendritic Cell-specific ICAM3-grabbing Non-integrin (CD209) on the Cell Surface

Abstract: The myeloid C-type lectin dendritic cell-specific ICAM3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN, CD209) recognizes oligosaccharide ligands on clinically relevant pathogens (HIV, Mycobacterium, and Aspergillus). Alternative splicing and genomic polymorphism generate DC-SIGN mRNA variants, which have been detected at sites of pathogen entrance and transmission. We present evidence that DC-SIGN neck variants are expressed on dendritic and myeloid cells at the RNA and protein levels. Structural analysis revealed that multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). As a control for impaired nanoclustering, we include the spot size distributions obtained for a DC-SIGN mutant lacking the neck region (ΔRep), known to abrogate nanoclustering (23,27). Interestingly, the spot size distributions for wtDC-SIGN and N80A are similar, with average values around 160 nm, in agreement with previously reported wtDC-SIGN values (21,23) and significantly larger than for ΔRep.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1B). As a control for impaired nanoclustering, we include the spot size distributions obtained for a DC-SIGN mutant lacking the neck region (ΔRep), known to abrogate nanoclustering (23,27). Interestingly, the spot size distributions for wtDC-SIGN and N80A are similar, with average values around 160 nm, in agreement with previously reported wtDC-SIGN values (21,23) and significantly larger than for ΔRep.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Because DC-SIGN forms nanoclusters on the cell surface and has a single N-glycosylation site (19,(21)(22)(23), we first investigated the role of N-glycosylation on the nanoscale organization of DC-SIGN using stimulated emission depletion (STED) nanoscopy. We used CHO cells stably expressing wild-type DC-SIGN (wtDC-SIGN) and a receptor variant presenting a point mutation within the DC-SIGN N-glycosylation motif (denoted as N80A), known to prevent receptor glycosylation (27). This cell system recapitulates DC-SIGN essential activities, such as antigen binding, internalization, and trafficking (23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A). The neck domain mediates multimerization of DC-SIGN, which is required for binding of ligands or pathogens [13,14]. The cytoplasmic tail of DC-SIGN includes internalization motifs, such as the LL and the EEE cluster [2,15], and an incomplete ITAM which is considered to be involved in signal transduction pathway [2,15].…”
Section: Contribution Of Ca 2+ Binding Site Of Dc-sign To the Phagocymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that Ca 2+ binding site in the CRD plays important roles in the surface expression as well as the interaction with Ca 2+ and microbes. It has been demonstrated that the neck domain of murine DC-SIGN responsible for tetramer formation is involved in efficient binding to multivalent ligands [16] and the impairment in tetramer formation results in the impairment of the binding to pathogens/ligands [14]. However, the involvement of Ca 2+ binding site of DC-SIGN in its multimerization still remains unclear.…”
Section: Contribution Of Ca 2+ Binding Site Of Dc-sign To the Phagocymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a type II trans-membrane C-type lectin with a single C-terminal Carbohydrate Recognition Domain (CRD). In the cellular membrane, DC-SIGN is assembled as a tetramer, due to an extended coiled-coil region that allows simultaneous presentation of four CRDs Feinberg et al, 2005;Serrano-Sierra-Gomez et al, 2008;Tabarani et al, 2009).…”
Section: Dc-signmentioning
confidence: 99%