2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm16688g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural requirements for fast lithium ion migration in Li10GeP2S12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

34
206
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
34
206
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the theoretical occupancy is 0.47 (ref. 8), in very good agreement with the experimental value. The higher occupancy of Li1, Li2, and Li3 in the literature probably results from neglecting the Li4 site.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For comparison, the theoretical occupancy is 0.47 (ref. 8), in very good agreement with the experimental value. The higher occupancy of Li1, Li2, and Li3 in the literature probably results from neglecting the Li4 site.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The small distance of 1.6 Å between two adjacent Li1 sites makes an occupancy >0.5 rather improbable as already discussed by Adams and Rao. 8 Therefore, the value obtained from single-crystal diffraction (0.48) is more realistic than the reported one (0.691). For comparison, the theoretical occupancy is 0.47 (ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first computational study on LGPS was performed by Mo et al 41 using AIMD simulations, and it showed that, contrary to the initial experimental hypothesis, LGPS is in fact an anisotropic 3D conductor rather than a 1D conductor (Figure 11). Similar results were obtained using classical MD simulations 40 and NEB calculations. 124 In another work, Xu et al 44 revealed the correlation diffusion behavior of Li + in the 1D channel from AIMD simulations, thus indicating that the low activation energy originates from the strong Coulombic repulsion against neighboring Li + in the same tube.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…Classical MD simulations use empirical potentials or force fields, such as those based on the Born model framework 33,39 and bond-valence methods. 40 The empirical potentials are based on mathematical formulas and parameters that are fitted from experimental and ab initio calculation input. The key advantage of classical MD simulations is their significantly lower computation costs compared with ab initio methods.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%