2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41062-020-0282-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural reliability software and calculation tools: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the assessment and prediction of the p f and p s of a deteriorating structural system require (a) formulation of the state functions of the individual components involved in the system, (b) identification of critical deterioration mechanisms affecting the state function of the components, (c) appropriate system modeling (e.g., series, parallel, and series-parallel systems), and (d) estimation of the correlation among the safety margins of individual components. El Hajj Chehade and Younes [33] and Shittu et al [34] reviewed the software programs used to compute the p f and p s of structural systems.…”
Section: General Concept Of Probability Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the assessment and prediction of the p f and p s of a deteriorating structural system require (a) formulation of the state functions of the individual components involved in the system, (b) identification of critical deterioration mechanisms affecting the state function of the components, (c) appropriate system modeling (e.g., series, parallel, and series-parallel systems), and (d) estimation of the correlation among the safety margins of individual components. El Hajj Chehade and Younes [33] and Shittu et al [34] reviewed the software programs used to compute the p f and p s of structural systems.…”
Section: General Concept Of Probability Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the FORM and similar methods have drawbacks. The mapping of the failure function onto a standardized set and its subsequent minimization involves significant computational effort for nonlinear black-box numerical models [8,24]. Simultaneously evaluating probabilities for multiple failure criteria adds considerable computational complexity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These input random variables exert the most significant positive impact (24) and negative impact (21) on the affected pipe element number 529. According to the presented results, the following input random variables (conservatively including the nearest to acceptance limits of 95%) were also used in the FORM analysis as input random variables:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%