2019
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2019jamdsm0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural relationships of metallurgical and mechanical properties influenced by Ni-based fillers on Gas Tungsten Arc Welded Ferritic /Austenitic SS dissimilar joints

Abstract: Gas Tungsten Arc Welding process using ERNiCrMo-3 filler metal. It is commonly used in nuclear industries where the weldments are usually subjected to hot corrosion. Devendranath Ramkumar et al. (2015) proposed that weldment between Inconel 718 and AISI 430, using Gas Tungsten Arc Welding obtained from ER2553 and ERNiCrMo-4 fillers and that suggested and brought into the base metals for accumulate numerous benefits in terms of metallurgical and mechanical properties for aerospace and nuclear sectors. Devendran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, ST20 15min showed 2 ± 0.5 J/cm 2 of impact toughness, which is extremely low. It is known that toughness is the weak place for joints, both welded and brazed [48]. However, specimens ST07 40min and ST15 40min showed high impact toughness-86 ±3 J/cm 2 and 90 ± 2 J/cm 2 , respectively-and the best UTS values: about 629 ± 9 MPa for the low-strainrate tests and 700 ± 5 MPa for the high-strain-rate tests.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ultimate Tensile Strength and Impact Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, ST20 15min showed 2 ± 0.5 J/cm 2 of impact toughness, which is extremely low. It is known that toughness is the weak place for joints, both welded and brazed [48]. However, specimens ST07 40min and ST15 40min showed high impact toughness-86 ±3 J/cm 2 and 90 ± 2 J/cm 2 , respectively-and the best UTS values: about 629 ± 9 MPa for the low-strainrate tests and 700 ± 5 MPa for the high-strain-rate tests.…”
Section: Comparison Of Ultimate Tensile Strength and Impact Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 92%