The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.33097/jncta.2019.03.03.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural relationships among servant leadership of major professors, creativity, entrepreneurship and career preparation behavior of undergraduate students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitness of the structural model was the same as that of the measurement model because there was no model change such as adding a covariance or adding a variable in the final measurement model. The validity of structural model is judged to be valid if the AVE (Average Variance Extracted) is greater than 0.5 or the CR (Construct Reliability) is greater than 0.7 (Seok, 2019). Therefore, this structural model is valid as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fitness of the structural model was the same as that of the measurement model because there was no model change such as adding a covariance or adding a variable in the final measurement model. The validity of structural model is judged to be valid if the AVE (Average Variance Extracted) is greater than 0.5 or the CR (Construct Reliability) is greater than 0.7 (Seok, 2019). Therefore, this structural model is valid as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%