1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0899-5362(99)00013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural relations and PbPb zircon ages for the Makuti gneisses: evidence for a crustal-scale Pan-African shear zone in the Zambezi Belt, northwest Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Zambezi Belt could, therefore, be interpreted as a collisional suture between two widely separated cratons (the Congo and Kalahari), so that rocks such as the Nchanga Granite on the Congo Craton cannot be genetically related to similar aged units in the Zambezi Belt, which were on the northern edge of the Kalahari Craton. Furthermore, the interpretation of the Zambezi Belt supracrustals, which include the Makuti Group of NW Zimbabwe, as a bimodal rift sequence (Munyanyiwa et al, 1997), has been questioned by Dirks et al (1999) who showed that rocks described as ''metaarkoses'' (Broderick, 1976) and ''meta-rhyolites'' (Munyanyiwa et al, 1997) are in fact sheared granites. The age of the Nchanga Granite is similar to, but slightly older than, those of the Lusaka Granite (842 ± 33 Ma; recalculated from Barr et al, 1978), the Ngoma Gneiss in the Zambezi Belt (820 ± 7 Ma; Hanson et al, 1988), and a megacrystic granite dated at 852 ± 11 Ma in the Tsumkwe area near the southern edge of the Congo Craton (Hoal et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Zambezi Belt could, therefore, be interpreted as a collisional suture between two widely separated cratons (the Congo and Kalahari), so that rocks such as the Nchanga Granite on the Congo Craton cannot be genetically related to similar aged units in the Zambezi Belt, which were on the northern edge of the Kalahari Craton. Furthermore, the interpretation of the Zambezi Belt supracrustals, which include the Makuti Group of NW Zimbabwe, as a bimodal rift sequence (Munyanyiwa et al, 1997), has been questioned by Dirks et al (1999) who showed that rocks described as ''metaarkoses'' (Broderick, 1976) and ''meta-rhyolites'' (Munyanyiwa et al, 1997) are in fact sheared granites. The age of the Nchanga Granite is similar to, but slightly older than, those of the Lusaka Granite (842 ± 33 Ma; recalculated from Barr et al, 1978), the Ngoma Gneiss in the Zambezi Belt (820 ± 7 Ma; Hanson et al, 1988), and a megacrystic granite dated at 852 ± 11 Ma in the Tsumkwe area near the southern edge of the Congo Craton (Hoal et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent geological, structural and geochronological data from the Zambezi Belt (e.g. Dirks et al 1999;Vinyu et al 1999) and central Dronning Maud Land (e.g. Jacobs et al 1998Jacobs et al , 1999Jacobs et al , 2003Bauer et al 2003)-Shackleton Range (Buggisch et al 1990Talarico et al 1999) support the idea that they contain the suture.…”
Section: Sutures Within East Gondwanamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In northeastern Zimbabwe, where metamorphic grade is in the amphibolite facies, the suite consists of basal quartzite or psammite overlain by a structural package of pelite, quartzite and marble (Barton et al 1991;Hargrove et al 2003), with volcanic and plutonic rocks dated between 808 and 795 Ma 84,85,89 . Farther west, abundant peralkaline sheets were emplaced along with mafic magmas, in a continental rift setting, presumably through the Palaeoproterozoic Magondi Belt (Munyanyiwa et al 1997;Dirks et al 1999). Igneous zircons from granitic gneisses have yielded a TIMS age of 831 AE 6 Ma 90 and Pb/Pb evaporation ages that range from 854 AE 0.8 to 737 AE 0.9 Ma 91-95 .…”
Section: Neoproterozoic Magmatism Rifting and Sedimentary Basinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lufilian and Zambezi Belts are characterized by thin-and thick-skinned thrusting, respectively, and the polarity of thrusting in the Lufilian-Zambezi Orogen is illustrated in Figure 7. In the Zambezi Belt north of the Zambezi Valley, thrust transport was toward the NNE-NE Hanson et al 1994;, whereas structures along the northern Kalahari margin are consistently SSE-verging (Barton et al 1991;Dirks et al 1999;Vinyu et al 1999;Müller et al 2001), indicating that the Lufilian-Zambezi Orogen was doubly vergent. Considering their spatial distribution, the orogen appears to have the architecture of an asymmetric, orogenic-scale structural fan.…”
Section: Neoproterozoic Ophiolites and Continental-margin-arc Magmatismmentioning
confidence: 99%