“…The Zambezi Belt could, therefore, be interpreted as a collisional suture between two widely separated cratons (the Congo and Kalahari), so that rocks such as the Nchanga Granite on the Congo Craton cannot be genetically related to similar aged units in the Zambezi Belt, which were on the northern edge of the Kalahari Craton. Furthermore, the interpretation of the Zambezi Belt supracrustals, which include the Makuti Group of NW Zimbabwe, as a bimodal rift sequence (Munyanyiwa et al, 1997), has been questioned by Dirks et al (1999) who showed that rocks described as ''metaarkoses'' (Broderick, 1976) and ''meta-rhyolites'' (Munyanyiwa et al, 1997) are in fact sheared granites. The age of the Nchanga Granite is similar to, but slightly older than, those of the Lusaka Granite (842 ± 33 Ma; recalculated from Barr et al, 1978), the Ngoma Gneiss in the Zambezi Belt (820 ± 7 Ma; Hanson et al, 1988), and a megacrystic granite dated at 852 ± 11 Ma in the Tsumkwe area near the southern edge of the Congo Craton (Hoal et al, 2000).…”