1986
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.9109
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural properties of double-stranded RNAs associated with biological control of chestnut blight fungus

Abstract: Double-stranded RNAs (ds RNAs) are thought to be the cytoplasmic determinants responsible for the phenomenon of transmissible hypovirulence in the chestnut blight fungus Endothiaparasitica [Murr.] Anderson. The three major ds RNA components associated with the North American hypovirulent strain, Grand Haven 2, were characterized with respect to molecular-hybridization specificity and RNase T1-digestion patterns. The large (L-RNA; %9 kilobase pairs) and middle-sized (M-RNA; -3,5 kilobase pairs) ds RNA component… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, multiple dsRNA molecules can result from subgenomic or defective interfering particles (Tartaglia et al 1986, Hiremath et al 1986). Indeed, the La France S3 dsRNA is an internally deleted variant of the M2 dsRNA (Harmsen et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, multiple dsRNA molecules can result from subgenomic or defective interfering particles (Tartaglia et al 1986, Hiremath et al 1986). Indeed, the La France S3 dsRNA is an internally deleted variant of the M2 dsRNA (Harmsen et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative amino acid sequence analysis described above revealed four conserved domains among the gene products of HAV, potyviruses, and BaYMV (one of which is duplicated in HAV). Tartaglia et al (27) For steps iii and iv, the alternative is the loss of the respective function followed by extensive divergence. In view of the potential for movement of the ancestral virus within the mycelium and the frequency of anastomosis, it is conceivable that an extracellular route of infection, and the required packaging function, would have been dispensable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although M 1 and L6, and probably S 1 and $2 d s R N A (Wach et al, 1987), do not seem necessary for expression of the disease, d s R N A s MI, S1 and $2 were never reported to be present in the absence of other major d s R N A segments and thus could be subgenomic. Subgenomic d s R N A s (Field et al, 1983, Tartaglia et al, 1986 and defective interfering d s R N A s (Thiele et al, 1984) occur widely in mycoviruses. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that M1, S1 and $2 represent subgenomic d s R N A s derived from larger d s R N A s because none of these d s R N A s formed homologous hybrids with any of the other d s R N A s (L1 to L5 and M2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%