2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.054108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural phase transition of Fe grown on Au(111)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in ref. 32 are consistent with the formation of the Fe particles and the 110 diffraction peak in the XRD. The growth mechanism of the Fe NWs is schematically depicted in Scheme 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results in ref. 32 are consistent with the formation of the Fe particles and the 110 diffraction peak in the XRD. The growth mechanism of the Fe NWs is schematically depicted in Scheme 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is possible that a temperature of 75 °C is sufficient decompose adsorbed Fc­(COOH) 2 on Au(111). The honeycomb feature appears to be atomic in nature, having a lattice constant of 4.4 Å, and thus adjacent atoms separated by 2.5 Å, and this is within the range observed for the growth of Fe atom monolayers on Au(111) . However, none of the reported structures for Fe on Au(111) are honeycomb lattices, so the exact identity of this feature is not definitively assigned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The honeycomb feature appears to be atomic in nature, having a lattice constant of 4.4 Å, and thus adjacent atoms separated by 2.5 Å, and this is within the range observed for the growth of Fe atom monolayers on Au(111). 38 However, none of the reported structures for Fe on Au(111) are honeycomb lattices, so the exact identity of this feature is not definitively assigned. It is worth noting that the images in Figure 10 contain numerous chiral hexamers and tetramers, in addition to few or isolated tilted dimer rows.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the structural point of view, when iron is deposited in vacuum on a fcc(111) metal surface, a crystalline structure phase transition fcc-Fe(111) → bcc-Fe(110) as a function of the film thickness is generally observed around a critical thickness of 2–3 atomic layers or monolayers (ML). This transition was observed on Ni(111), Cu(111), Pt(111), , and Au(111). Surprisingly, this critical thickness seems to be quasi-independent of the lattice mismatch ε between fcc-Fe(111) and the substrate: ε ∼ +3% if fcc Fe(111) is deposited on Ni(111) but −12% if deposited on Au(111). For films thicker than 3 ML, the exact in plane orientation of the Fe bcc lattice with respect to the underlying fcc lattice has remained a matter of controversy (see ref and references therein) as to whether it follows the Nishiyama-Wassermann (NW) model or the Kurdjumov-Sachs (KS) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%