2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural performance of stainless steel circular hollow sections under combined axial load and bending – Part 1: Experiments and numerical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the hot-finished sections, the flat and corner coupons behave similarly, but the corner coupons exhibit slightly lower ductility; this may be due to the manner in which the corner coupons were gripped since these coupons typically fractured near the jaws of the tensile testing machine. Alternative gripping techniques for curved coupons, such as clamping the coupons in pairs around a circular bar [18] at the ends and loading the coupon through pins [19,20], have been adopted in previous studies to attempt to overcome such problems. Ratios of the corner to flat yield strength f yc /f y , ultimate tensile strength f uc /f u , strain at ultimate tensile strength ε uc /ε u , plastic strain at fracture ε fc /ε f , area reduction Z c /Z, and fuc fyc / fu fy are reported in Table 5.…”
Section: Tensile Coupon Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the hot-finished sections, the flat and corner coupons behave similarly, but the corner coupons exhibit slightly lower ductility; this may be due to the manner in which the corner coupons were gripped since these coupons typically fractured near the jaws of the tensile testing machine. Alternative gripping techniques for curved coupons, such as clamping the coupons in pairs around a circular bar [18] at the ends and loading the coupon through pins [19,20], have been adopted in previous studies to attempt to overcome such problems. Ratios of the corner to flat yield strength f yc /f y , ultimate tensile strength f uc /f u , strain at ultimate tensile strength ε uc /ε u , plastic strain at fracture ε fc /ε f , area reduction Z c /Z, and fuc fyc / fu fy are reported in Table 5.…”
Section: Tensile Coupon Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, a series of parametric studies are reported, using the finite element (FE) models validated in the companion paper [44], to expand the available test data pool over a wider range of stainless steel grades, cross-section slendernesses and combinations of loading. All the numerically derived data, together with the experimental results, are then compared with the resistances predicted by EN 1993-1-4 [1], SEI/ASCE-8 [2] and AS/NZS 4673 [3], enabling the accuracy of the existing codified methods to be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties of the tested cross-sections were determined through prior tensile coupon testing [13] and a brief summary of the key test results are reported herein. For each of the two studied cross-sections, two longitudinal coupons, extracted at 90 degrees from the weld (see Fig.…”
Section: Materials Testing and Geometric Imperfection Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of stub column [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and bending [3,11,12] tests have been performed on CHS of varying cross-section classes, in order to investigate their local buckling behaviour and the corresponding loading-carrying and deformation capacities under isolated loading conditions. Zhao et al [13] conducted a comprehensive experimental programme on eccentrically loaded stub columns to study the structural performance of stainless steel CHS subjected to combined axial load and bending moment. Comparisons of the test results with codified cross-section strength predictions revealed undue conservatism in current design standards, mainly due to the lack of consideration of the pronounced strain hardening exhibited by stainless steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%