2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete members: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corrosion of reinforcing steel is the most destroying pathology that reinforced concrete structures (RCS) present, considered by the experts the main causative factor of the operation, durability and useful life decrease of the RCS [1]- [4], what means a big problem of premature economic costs or medium period in addition to a negative impact to our society due to the uncertainty of possible significant structural failures in civil works [5]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corrosion of reinforcing steel is the most destroying pathology that reinforced concrete structures (RCS) present, considered by the experts the main causative factor of the operation, durability and useful life decrease of the RCS [1]- [4], what means a big problem of premature economic costs or medium period in addition to a negative impact to our society due to the uncertainty of possible significant structural failures in civil works [5]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is indicating the significant role interplay between the stainless steel and other DM variable factors. This is the proof that Stainless Steel is responsible for the high cost of the DM (Rabi, Shamass, & Cashell, 2022). It therefore suggests that replacement of stainless steel with another viable material like hard plastic will drastically reduce the cost DM production (Olorunnisola, 2021).…”
Section: Factor Plotmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is a general scarcity of experimental research on the structural behaviour and design of CHS beam-columns, including hot-finished [7][8][9][10], coldfinished [8,[11][12][13] and fabricated CHS [14,15]. The coldformed CHS exhibit a continuous rounded stress-strain response caused by cold-working throughout the forming process, whereas the hot-finished CHS have a linear elastic response followed by well-defined yield plateau and moderate degree of strain hardening [16][17][18][19][20][21]. More recently, Meng and Gardner [22] conducted a series of experimental and numerical tests on hot-finished and cold-formed CHS beam-columns made from both normal-and high-strength steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%