2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural performance of composite tidal turbine blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The erosion test platform as illustrated in Figure 5 was used. An impact velocity of 4.7 m/s was used, based on the hydrodynamic design of tidal turbine blades implemented in other work, 34 measured with a PEAKMETER anemometer model PM6252B, a 10 mm in diameter nozzle for outflow of sand, (standard measurement of the platform), a separation distance between the nozzle and the sample of 5 mm, an impact angle of 90°C of the sand flow on the sample and a flow pressure average of 4.5 bar (450 kPa), recorded with a PROBLOCK manometer and an average ambient temperature of 22°C, were considered. Initially, the samples were washed with water mixed with a few drops of liquid detergent for 5 min at room temperature in a COLE PARMER brand ultrasonic bath (model 8848), then they were dried with absorbent paper and weighed on an OHAUS analytical balance to obtain the initial mass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The erosion test platform as illustrated in Figure 5 was used. An impact velocity of 4.7 m/s was used, based on the hydrodynamic design of tidal turbine blades implemented in other work, 34 measured with a PEAKMETER anemometer model PM6252B, a 10 mm in diameter nozzle for outflow of sand, (standard measurement of the platform), a separation distance between the nozzle and the sample of 5 mm, an impact angle of 90°C of the sand flow on the sample and a flow pressure average of 4.5 bar (450 kPa), recorded with a PROBLOCK manometer and an average ambient temperature of 22°C, were considered. Initially, the samples were washed with water mixed with a few drops of liquid detergent for 5 min at room temperature in a COLE PARMER brand ultrasonic bath (model 8848), then they were dried with absorbent paper and weighed on an OHAUS analytical balance to obtain the initial mass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a damage mechanics approach was used for tidal blade design [15], and a PreComp and finite-element analysis (FEA) process was employed for blade design [16]. A study utilizing a 1 m blade (of a similar scale to the MHKF1 blade) was also conducted, which involved comparing FEA results to digital image correlation from blade structural testing [17,18]. The project presented herein involves a comprehensive five-step process aimed at the design, manufacturing, and testing of an open-source composite blade.…”
Section: Blade Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to sustain higher loads in water, a wind turbine design with a large flange may not be feasible for a hydrokinetic turbine. Additionally, a hydrokinetic turbine blade requires a lower aspect ratio and larger sectional thickness to sustain the higher loads in water 38 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%