2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural performance of buried prestressed concrete cylinder pipes with harnessed joints interaction using numerical modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gross wrapping stress of the prestressing wire is 75% of the specified minimum tensile strength of the wire, as shown in (10). The yield strength of the wire is 85% of the specified minimum tensile strength of the wire, as shown in (11).…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gross wrapping stress of the prestressing wire is 75% of the specified minimum tensile strength of the wire, as shown in (10). The yield strength of the wire is 85% of the specified minimum tensile strength of the wire, as shown in (11).…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broken wires are no longer used in the numerical analysis after breakage, which results in no strain in the broken wires, as shown in Figure 16. According to the constitutive relationship in (10) and (11), the actual yield strain of the prestressing wire after wrapping around concrete can be calculated as 1455 . Figure 16 illustrates that no prestressing wire yields.…”
Section: Deformation Of Prestressingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, it is considered that the cracks at the inner concrete core and the mortar coating, the corroded steel cylinder, and eventual breakage of enough wires at the barrel led to reduce the strength of the pipe. Hajali et al [43] and Hajali et al [44] It is important to highlight that a structural analysis was not conducted due to the lack of pipe material data. Likewise, it can be expected that the findings of Ge and Sinha [41], Hajali et al [43] and Hajali et al [44] remain valid for the Class 90-14 54-in.…”
Section: Probable Failure Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that broken wires do not have a significant impact on a PCCP with good mortar adhesion. Hajali et al [24][25][26] considered the pipe-soil interaction, the interaction between neighboring pipes, and internal and external loads in modeling the effects of the position and number of broken wires on a PCCP using a three-dimensional finite element model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%