2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Parameters of Seven Small Magellanic Cloud Intermediate-Age and Old Star Clusters

Abstract: We present structural parameters for the seven intermediate-age and old star clusters NGC 121, Lindsay 1, Kron 3, NGC 339, NGC 416, Lindsay 38, and NGC 419 in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). We fit King profiles and Elson, Fall, and Freeman profiles to both surface-brightness and star-count data taken with the Advanced Camera for Surveys aboard the Hubble Space Telescope. Clusters older than ∼1 Gyr show a spread in cluster core radii that increases with age, while the youngest clusters have relatively compac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(167 reference statements)
5
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The cluster disruption time for the SMC and the LMC derived in the literature is on the order of 8 × 10 9 Myr (e.g., Boutloukos & Lamers 2003;Parmentier & de Grijs 2008). We have shown (Glatt et al 2009) that clusters with ages older than 1 Gyr have a trend to larger core radii with increasing age. This trend was first found by Mackey & Gilmore (2003a) and is also visible for LMC, Fornax, and Sagittarius clusters (Mackey & Gilmore 2003b,c).…”
Section: Dissolution Effectsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The cluster disruption time for the SMC and the LMC derived in the literature is on the order of 8 × 10 9 Myr (e.g., Boutloukos & Lamers 2003;Parmentier & de Grijs 2008). We have shown (Glatt et al 2009) that clusters with ages older than 1 Gyr have a trend to larger core radii with increasing age. This trend was first found by Mackey & Gilmore (2003a) and is also visible for LMC, Fornax, and Sagittarius clusters (Mackey & Gilmore 2003b,c).…”
Section: Dissolution Effectsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, given the relatively weak tidal fields in the LMC/SMC, and the fact the intermediate age (and older) clusters do not appear to be tidally limited (e.g., Glatt et al 2009), it is more likely that the intermediate age clusters have not undergone strong mass loss, hence their current masses and escape velocities are similar to their initial values. In this interpretation, we see that there is no relation between the mass or escape velocity of clusters that do or do not display the extended MSTO feature (i.e.…”
Section: Comparison With the Intermediate Age Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our rc estimate is in good agreement with the value of rc = 15. 26 found by Glatt et al (2009) by fitting a King profile to the number density profiles. Our estimate for the tidal radius is however significantly smaller than the value published in Glatt et al (2009), rt = 165 .…”
Section: Structural Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 found by Glatt et al (2009) by fitting a King profile to the number density profiles. Our estimate for the tidal radius is however significantly smaller than the value published in Glatt et al (2009), rt = 165 . This discrepancy is not surprising given that the size of the cluster exceeds the observed field.…”
Section: Structural Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%