2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural order parameters, the Prigogine–Defay ratio and the behavior of the entropy in vitrification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Among these recent works, Gutzow, Schmelzer, and co-workers have brought new aspects to the field. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Using the so-called lattice-hole theory of liquids, and an evolution equation for the order parameter as a function of temperature, they investigated the process of vitrification and structural recovery following defined temperature protocols. 18,19,23,24 Among other points, a new expression for the Prigogine-Defay ratio and a thermodynamic definition of the fictive temperature was provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Among these recent works, Gutzow, Schmelzer, and co-workers have brought new aspects to the field. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Using the so-called lattice-hole theory of liquids, and an evolution equation for the order parameter as a function of temperature, they investigated the process of vitrification and structural recovery following defined temperature protocols. 18,19,23,24 Among other points, a new expression for the Prigogine-Defay ratio and a thermodynamic definition of the fictive temperature was provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of this rather complicated formulation, its physical foundation is comparable to that which forms the basis of older and more recently published models in which the pressure and the volume are used as mechanical state variables (cf. Schmelzer and Gutzow, 2009;Christensen et al, 2007;Christensen and Dyre, 2008;Jones, 1953a, 1953b;de Donder andvan Rysselberghe, 1936 or Lesikar andMoynihan, 1980). In comparison with pure frequency-domain approaches as developed, for example, in Christensen et al (2007) or Christensen and Dyre (2008) the current model is originally formulated in the time domain and then evaluated for harmonic temperature-or stress-controlled excitations in the frequency domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables are introduced as phenomenological measures for the configurational order of the material (cf. Schmelzer and Gutzow, 2009;Jones, 1953b or Möller et al, 2006) and are denoted as order parameters. They describe the deviation of the current state of the material from its equilibrium and remain constant, if the pressure or the temperature is changing rapidly.…”
Section: Models To Describe Glass-forming Materials In the Region Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,9 No proof is given in Ref. 1 and in previous works that suggest neglecting the two affinity derivatives in Eq.…”
Section: ∂V ∂ξmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since some of these errors are systematically reproduced in several papers published these last years by the same group, we feel obliged to draw attention to them. [2][3][4] In the seminal papers of Davies and Jones on the irreversible approach to equilibrium in glasses, 5 or on the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of glasses, 6 the notion of structural order parameter ξ was used to describe the nonequilibrium behavior of systems undergoing a glass transition. Particularly, it is nowadays admitted that, since the experimentally determined values of the Prigogine-Defay (PD) ratio at the glass temperature are generally different from unity, then more than one structural order parameter are involved in the thermodynamics of the glass transition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%