Abstract:After publication of the original article, three errors were discovered in Figure 2 and its legend. In Figure 2A, the dATP curve was described as red and the dGTP curve as blue; in fact, the dATP curve is blue and the dGTP curve is red. In Figure 2C, the dATP and dGTP curves were colored incorrectly, i.e., dATP in red and dGTP in blue. This was inconsistent with the coloring of the other panels. Finally, in the legend for Figure 2E, the colors of the curves were also wrongly described, as in Figure 2A. The fig… Show more
“…RNR plays a critical role in regulating the total rate of DNA synthesis, so that DNA to cell mass is maintained at a constant ratio during cell division and DNA repair 3 . RNR enzymes are divided into three classes termed class I, class II, and class III, based on how radicals are generated during the reaction 4 . Class I is the most extensively studied RNR and is present in all eukaryotes and some prokaryotes 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RRM1 is the regulatory subunit harboring two allosteric sites for its regulation 5–7 . RRM2 generates a stable tyrosine radical which is transferred to RRM1 cysteine residues to initiate the reduction reaction upon binding of the substrate 4,5 . In addition, p53R2 is encoded by the RRM2B gene, is induced by p53, and has been identified as a second radical-providing small subunit in mammalian cells 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNR is allosterically regulated at two levels influencing overall activity and substrate specificity 4,7 . The overall activity is regulated by binding of ATP (stimulatory) or dATP (inhibitory) to the activity site (A site) on the RRM1 subunit 7 .…”
Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) catalyzes the de novo synthesis of deoxyribonucleoside diphosphates (dNDPs) to provide dNTP precursors for DNA synthesis. Here, we report that acetylation and deacetylation of the RRM2 subunit of RNR acts as a molecular switch that impacts RNR activity, dNTP synthesis, and DNA replication fork progression. Acetylation of RRM2 at K95 abrogates RNR activity by disrupting its homodimer assembly. RRM2 is directly acetylated by KAT7, and deacetylated by Sirt2, respectively. Sirt2, which level peak in S phase, sustains RNR activity at or above a threshold level required for dNTPs synthesis. We also find that radiation or camptothecin-induced DNA damage promotes RRM2 deacetylation by enhancing Sirt2–RRM2 interaction. Acetylation of RRM2 at K95 results in the reduction of the dNTP pool, DNA replication fork stalling, and the suppression of tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. This study therefore identifies acetylation as a regulatory mechanism governing RNR activity.
“…RNR plays a critical role in regulating the total rate of DNA synthesis, so that DNA to cell mass is maintained at a constant ratio during cell division and DNA repair 3 . RNR enzymes are divided into three classes termed class I, class II, and class III, based on how radicals are generated during the reaction 4 . Class I is the most extensively studied RNR and is present in all eukaryotes and some prokaryotes 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RRM1 is the regulatory subunit harboring two allosteric sites for its regulation 5–7 . RRM2 generates a stable tyrosine radical which is transferred to RRM1 cysteine residues to initiate the reduction reaction upon binding of the substrate 4,5 . In addition, p53R2 is encoded by the RRM2B gene, is induced by p53, and has been identified as a second radical-providing small subunit in mammalian cells 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNR is allosterically regulated at two levels influencing overall activity and substrate specificity 4,7 . The overall activity is regulated by binding of ATP (stimulatory) or dATP (inhibitory) to the activity site (A site) on the RRM1 subunit 7 .…”
Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) catalyzes the de novo synthesis of deoxyribonucleoside diphosphates (dNDPs) to provide dNTP precursors for DNA synthesis. Here, we report that acetylation and deacetylation of the RRM2 subunit of RNR acts as a molecular switch that impacts RNR activity, dNTP synthesis, and DNA replication fork progression. Acetylation of RRM2 at K95 abrogates RNR activity by disrupting its homodimer assembly. RRM2 is directly acetylated by KAT7, and deacetylated by Sirt2, respectively. Sirt2, which level peak in S phase, sustains RNR activity at or above a threshold level required for dNTPs synthesis. We also find that radiation or camptothecin-induced DNA damage promotes RRM2 deacetylation by enhancing Sirt2–RRM2 interaction. Acetylation of RRM2 at K95 results in the reduction of the dNTP pool, DNA replication fork stalling, and the suppression of tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. This study therefore identifies acetylation as a regulatory mechanism governing RNR activity.
“…Many of these class Ic-like sequences are found in the NrdAz and NrdAq clades ( Figure 6B , light blue branches). The NrdAz clade is also notable for having many subclades and a high occurrence of sequences with multiple ATP-cones, such as the P. aeruginosa class Ia RNR and Chlamydia trachomatis class Ic RNR, which have 2 and 3 ATP-cones, respectively ( Figure 6B , Pa and Ct ) (Johansson et al, 2016b; Roshick et al, 2000; Torrents et al, 2006). As discussed in our SSN analysis of ATP cones ( Figure 5B , NrdAz), the N-terminal copy within the tandem ATP-cones in NrdAz sequences is most homologous to the ancestral ATP-cone motif.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the third copies (Figure 5A, gray hexagonal nodes in spoke 3) extend out of the cluster of second copies. Previously, it was demonstrated with the two tandem ATP-cones of Pseudomonas aeruginosa class Ia RNR that only the N-terminal copy is functional, while the second copy is unable to bind ligands (Johansson et al, 2016a). Based on this finding, it was proposed that the N-terminal copy was acquired to regain allosteric regulation after the inner copy had lost function due to sequence degradation.…”
Section: A Single Origin For the N-terminal Atp-cone Domainsmentioning
Ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs) are used by all organisms and many viruses to catalyze an essential step in the de novo biosynthesis of DNA precursors. RNRs are remarkably diverse by primary sequence and cofactor requirement, while sharing a conserved fold and radical-based mechanism for nucleotide reduction. Here, we structurally aligned the diverse RNR family by the conserved catalytic barrel to reconstruct the first large-scale phylogeny consisting of 6,779 sequences that unites all extant classes of the RNR family and performed evo-velocity analysis to independently validate our evolutionary model. With a robust phylogeny in-hand, we uncovered a novel, phylogenetically distinct clade that is placed as ancestral to the classes I and II RNRs, which we have termed clade Ø. We employed small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), and AlphaFold2 to investigate a member of this clade from Synechococcus phage S-CBP4 and report the most minimal RNR architecture to-date. Using the catalytic barrel as a starting point for diversification, we traced the evolutionarily relatedness of insertions and extensions that confer the diversity observed in the RNR family. Based on our analyses, we propose an evolutionary model of diversification in the RNR family and delineate how our phylogeny can be used as a roadmap for targeted future study.
Ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs) are used by all free‐living organisms and many viruses to catalyze an essential step in the de novo biosynthesis of DNA precursors. RNRs are remarkably diverse by primary sequence and cofactor requirement, while sharing a conserved fold and radical‐based mechanism for nucleotide reduction. In this work, we expand on our recent phylogenetic inference of the entire RNR family and describe the evolutionarily relatedness of insertions and extensions around the structurally homologous catalytic barrel. Using evo‐velocity and sequence similarity network (SSN) analyses, we show that the N‐terminal regulatory motif known as the ATP‐cone domain was likely inherited from an ancestral RNR. By combining SSN analysis with AlphaFold2 predictions, we also show that the C‐terminal extensions of class II RNRs can contain folded domains that share homology with an Fe‐S cluster assembly protein. Finally, using sequence analysis and AlphaFold2, we show that the sequence motif of a catalytically essential insertion known as the finger loop is tightly coupled to the catalytic mechanism. Based on these results, we propose an evolutionary model for the diversification of the RNR family.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.