2011
DOI: 10.1080/15732471003588387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural integrity monitoring for dependability

Abstract: Dependability of a structural system is a comprehensive concept that by definition describes the quality of the system as its ability to perform as expected in a way that can justifiably be trusted. One of the attributes of dependability is integrity, which can be interpreted as the absence of improper alterations of the structural configuration. The assessment of the integrity during the whole life-cycle can be carried out efficiently by implementing a monitoring system able to detect and diagnose any fault a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following paragraphs, the dependability attributes, means, and threats (Figure 3) are introduced and briefly discussed, extending what is reported in Arangio et al (2010).…”
Section: Dependability Of Complex Structural Systemsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following paragraphs, the dependability attributes, means, and threats (Figure 3) are introduced and briefly discussed, extending what is reported in Arangio et al (2010).…”
Section: Dependability Of Complex Structural Systemsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, in the field of electronic systems engineering, the concepts of dependability and dependable system have been defined and a framework has been set for the dependable design, creation, operation, and management (Laprie, 1992). This framework has been extended to complex structural systems, as integration to the broadly accepted structural requirements for the design, construction, and maintenance of structures, when considering the optimization of the design process of the system within a performance‐based approach (Arangio et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the most plausible model class is the one that possesses the best trade-off between the data fitting efficiency and robustness to modeling error. This approach has been applied to a number of engineering problems, including architecture of neural networks [105,147], damage detection [148], estimation of fault rupture extent [149]; identification for hysteretic structural dynamical models [150], air quality modeling [151], soil compressibility relationship [152], biomedical engineering [153], environmental effects to structural modal parameters [154], structural integrity monitoring [155], crack detection [156,157], and seismic attenuation relationship [158]. For more general cases in which the Gaussian approximation is inappropriate, one may use the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation method [159] to evaluate directly the evidence integral in Eq.…”
Section: Model Complexity Sensitivity Data Fitting Capability and Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative assessment of ground displacement affecting infrastructure is traditionally based on ground instrumentation, using automatic total stations, ground, and mobile laser scanners, with sub-centimeter precision that are useful for maintenance processes [1]. Space-borne Differential SAR Interferometry (DInSAR) is an alternative solution that can be fully assimilated into ground monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%