2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00070-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural integrity assessment procedure for Europe – of the SINTAP programme overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1a), r y1 represents the effective macroscopic yield strength in the x-direction (loading direction), which is an important consideration in this flexible electronics application both for static loading and because it correlates with fatigue strength. 22,23 In Eq. (1b) we require that the effective elastic constant, S 1111 , match that of the substrate, S sub 1111 , to which it is applied.…”
Section: Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1a), r y1 represents the effective macroscopic yield strength in the x-direction (loading direction), which is an important consideration in this flexible electronics application both for static loading and because it correlates with fatigue strength. 22,23 In Eq. (1b) we require that the effective elastic constant, S 1111 , match that of the substrate, S sub 1111 , to which it is applied.…”
Section: Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the equivalence relation of Eq. (9f), which requires that the value of a TJDF at the point (x 12 , x 23 ) be equal to the value of the TJDF at point (Àx 23 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Webster and Bannister examined the correlation of Y/T ratio and yield strength [82]. Two simple relationships were produced, one providing upper bound Y/T ratio, the other providing the best fit to the data.…”
Section: Stress-strain Property Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fracture toughness is one of the most important material properties for assessing the structural integrity (Webster, 2000) or investigate the causes of component failures (Urriolagoitia, 2012;Delgado, 1998). In the case of components in service, a sample of material must be removed to evaluate fracture toughness which could endanger the integrity of that component; additional concerns arise when the critical testing region is so small that specimens cannot be obtained with the minimum size requirements of the standard test methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%