2021
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9040837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Insights into the Methane-Generating Enzyme from a Methoxydotrophic Methanogen Reveal a Restrained Gallery of Post-Translational Modifications

Abstract: Methanogenic archaea operate an ancient, if not primordial, metabolic pathway that releases methane as an end-product. This last step is orchestrated by the methyl-coenzyme M reductase (MCR), which uses a nickel-containing F430-cofactor as the catalyst. MCR astounds the scientific world by its unique reaction chemistry, its numerous post-translational modifications, and its importance in biotechnology not only for production but also for capturing the greenhouse gas methane. In this report, we investigated MCR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M. shengliensis ZC-1 (DSM 18856) was also obtained from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany) and was grown anaerobically on methanol as previously described in Kurth and Müller et al 2021 46 .…”
Section: Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. shengliensis ZC-1 (DSM 18856) was also obtained from the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany) and was grown anaerobically on methanol as previously described in Kurth and Müller et al 2021 46 .…”
Section: Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information. [18,22,[28][29][30][31][32] Raw data are freely available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8250713).…”
Section: Supporting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum set of three modifications was observed in M. shengliensis ; two of them, the 5( S )-methylarginine and thioglycine, are not essential as shown by genetics, even if their absence could have dramatic effects on growth depending on the supplied substrate, culture temperature, and methane production. 99 , 103 105 Structural superposition shows that additional modifications have only a small, even negligible, impact on the local environment. Of course, it must be mentioned here that all of these MCR structures used for comparison are crystallographic snapshots, with most of them in the inactive state (Ni II -silent).…”
Section: Differences In Cofactors and Post-translational Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(D) Experimentally demonstrated post-translational modifications in characterized ACRs. Modifications demonstrated by X-ray crystallography, mass spectrometry, or both methods are colored yellow, blue, or black, respectively, with the corresponding reference. ,, ,, A double dagger indicates the modifications that are supposed to be present even if the peptides were not detected by mass spectrometry …”
Section: Differences In Cofactors and Post-translational Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%