2024
DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.23.586386
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural insights into the agonist selectivity and structure-based engineering of the adenosine A3 receptor

Hidetaka S. Oshima,
Akiko Ogawa,
Fumiya K. Sano
et al.

Abstract: Adenosine receptors, expressed across various tissues, play pivotal roles in physiological processes and are implicated in diverse diseases, including neurological disorders and inflammation, highlighting the therapeutic potential of receptor-selective agents. The Adenosine A3 receptor (A3R), the last identified adenosine receptor, is also activated by breakdown products of post-transcriptionally modified tRNA and exhibits dual roles in neuron, heart, and immune cells, and is often overexpressed in tumors, mak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(106 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AR binding affinities were determined at three subtypes of hARs using standard radioligand inhibition assays, and mAR affinity was determined for some analogues for comparison (Table ). ,, The affinities represented a greater range than previously reported 2-arylethynyl (N)-methanocarba 5′-methylamides such as 2b , 3a , and 4 – 8 . Consistently, homologous 2-arylethynyl derivatives prepared here that contain a 2-chlorophenylethynyl moiety ( 3b – 3d ) displayed potent hA 3 AR affinities. Among the 2-aryl derivatives, the following compounds showed the highest hA 3 AR affinity ( K i , nM): 9 , 3.28; 14 , 4.82; 23 , 2.44; 27 , 10.1; 34 , 8.66.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AR binding affinities were determined at three subtypes of hARs using standard radioligand inhibition assays, and mAR affinity was determined for some analogues for comparison (Table ). ,, The affinities represented a greater range than previously reported 2-arylethynyl (N)-methanocarba 5′-methylamides such as 2b , 3a , and 4 – 8 . Consistently, homologous 2-arylethynyl derivatives prepared here that contain a 2-chlorophenylethynyl moiety ( 3b – 3d ) displayed potent hA 3 AR affinities. Among the 2-aryl derivatives, the following compounds showed the highest hA 3 AR affinity ( K i , nM): 9 , 3.28; 14 , 4.82; 23 , 2.44; 27 , 10.1; 34 , 8.66.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The A 3 AR, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) of Class A, has been modeled extensively using homology modeling and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation prior to the very recent report of experimental structures. We and others have investigated the structure–activity relationship (SAR) of adenosine-derived A 3 AR agonists, and recently structure-guided approaches have been used to arrive at highly selective agonists , , Two prototypical A 3 AR agonists 1a and 1b (Figure ) containing a 5′- N -methylcarboxamido-ribose moiety are in advanced clinical trials (Phases 2 and 3). , However, greater A 3 AR selectivity can be achieved by replacing the furanose ring of adenosine analogues with a North (N) methanocarba (bicyclo[3.1.0]­hexyl) ring system. , , This ring system enforces a rigid conformation that approximates the receptor-preferred conformation, particularly in the A 3 AR case. The enhanced affinity is consistent with an entropic cost in the binding of the corresponding ribose analogue, which can attain either a (N) or South (S) conformation, either in solution or when receptor bound .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%