2014
DOI: 10.1111/misp.12026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Injustice and the Distribution of Forward-Looking Responsibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While restricting the political responsibilities of business to non-coercive activities, one might wonder whether this is not still overburdening the corporation with additional tasks and responsibilities. Even though Young provides some indication of what can be reasonably expected of different actors concerning structural injustices -relative capacities and degree of connection to injustice seem to be key -these parameters of reasoning remain notoriously vague (Neuhäuser 2014). In order to think about what can be expected of corporate actors operating in different sectors and in countries with various degrees of (in)effective government, it is imperative to further explore these parameters and corresponding grounds for responsibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While restricting the political responsibilities of business to non-coercive activities, one might wonder whether this is not still overburdening the corporation with additional tasks and responsibilities. Even though Young provides some indication of what can be reasonably expected of different actors concerning structural injustices -relative capacities and degree of connection to injustice seem to be key -these parameters of reasoning remain notoriously vague (Neuhäuser 2014). In order to think about what can be expected of corporate actors operating in different sectors and in countries with various degrees of (in)effective government, it is imperative to further explore these parameters and corresponding grounds for responsibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By including these organizations in our moral vocabulary, they can be induced to act. By blaming and praising these organizations, they are stimulated to reorient and develop themselves and to improve (e.g., Baier 1991;French 1984;Forrest 2006;List and Pettit 2011;Neuh€ auser 2014;O'Neill 1986;Wasserstrom 1991).…”
Section: The Consequences Of Organizational Agency For Our Moral Pracmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Schiff also questions the ability of the social connection model to address bad faith, which is a form of lying to oneself and entails concealing from ourselves the ways in which our everyday consumption patterns. Neuhauser (2014) criticizes the social connection model for its lack of normative standard and operational framework because the model says a little about how the shared responsibility is…”
Section: Israel Was One Of the First Countries To Sign A Preferential Trade Agreement With The European Economic Community (Eec)mentioning
confidence: 99%