International Students and Global Mobility in Higher Education 2011
DOI: 10.1057/9780230117143_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Incentives to Attract Foreign Students to Canada’s Postsecondary Educational System: A Comparative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Topic-wise, recent research covers in and out student mobility (Collins 2010;Findlay et al 2006;King, Findlay, and Ahrens 2010;Murphy-Lejeune 2002), students' motivations and experiences (Brooks and Waters 2009;, Liu-Farrer 2009, links between ISM and employability Waters andBrooks 2010, 2011), social class as a determinant of participation Waters and Brooks 2010), experiences and migration trajectories upon completion of the programme (Hazen and Alberts 2006;Ichimoto 2004;Norris and Gillespie 2009;Waters and Brooks 2011) and policy discussions (Gribble 2008;Hawthorne 2005). 1 Research on ISM into Canada is still in its infancy, and is limited to statistical overviews (Verbik and Lasanowski 2007), surveys and quantitative studies (CBIE 2009;Chirkov et al 2007Chirkov et al , 2008Lu, Zong, and Schissel 2009), policy discussions/outcomes (Bond 2007;Mchale 2006;WaltonRoberts 2009WaltonRoberts , 2011) and a small minority of qualitative studies exploring the student experiences within the framework of secondary, higher or adult education (Park 2010; Sherriff et al 2012;Waters 2006). Much work on ISM in Canada focuses on how the student experience reflects on the universities and their services, or on government policies; the student migrants themselves and their experiences are rarely the main concern.…”
Section: Ismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topic-wise, recent research covers in and out student mobility (Collins 2010;Findlay et al 2006;King, Findlay, and Ahrens 2010;Murphy-Lejeune 2002), students' motivations and experiences (Brooks and Waters 2009;, Liu-Farrer 2009, links between ISM and employability Waters andBrooks 2010, 2011), social class as a determinant of participation Waters and Brooks 2010), experiences and migration trajectories upon completion of the programme (Hazen and Alberts 2006;Ichimoto 2004;Norris and Gillespie 2009;Waters and Brooks 2011) and policy discussions (Gribble 2008;Hawthorne 2005). 1 Research on ISM into Canada is still in its infancy, and is limited to statistical overviews (Verbik and Lasanowski 2007), surveys and quantitative studies (CBIE 2009;Chirkov et al 2007Chirkov et al , 2008Lu, Zong, and Schissel 2009), policy discussions/outcomes (Bond 2007;Mchale 2006;WaltonRoberts 2009WaltonRoberts , 2011) and a small minority of qualitative studies exploring the student experiences within the framework of secondary, higher or adult education (Park 2010; Sherriff et al 2012;Waters 2006). Much work on ISM in Canada focuses on how the student experience reflects on the universities and their services, or on government policies; the student migrants themselves and their experiences are rarely the main concern.…”
Section: Ismmentioning
confidence: 99%