1991
DOI: 10.2307/2290581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Image Restoration Through Deformable Templates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rationale behind building a population-specific atlas is described in (Mazziotta, Toga et al 2001)); the practical impact of such an atlas on the analysis of functional data is described in Good et al (Good, Johnsrude et al 2001), and its impact on the analysis of pediatric data is given in (Wilke M. 2002), (Wilke M. 2003), and (Kazemi, Moghaddam et al 2007). To reiterate the most important issues, an unbiased brain template is needed (1) to provide a registration target for automatic image processing techniques (e.g., those in (Evans, Collins et al 1993), (Collins, Neelin et al 1994), and (Thompson and Toga 2002)); (2) to act as an atlas for volume estimation of brain regions (Amit, Grenander et al 1991); (Christensen, Rabbitt et al 1994); (Collins, Zijdenbos et al 1999); (Mazziotta, Toga et al 2001); (Mazziotta, Toga et al 2001); (Toga and Thompson 2001); (Thompson and Toga 2002); (Essen and C. 2002) (Thompson and Toga 2002; Toga and Thompson 2007); (Essen and David 2005); (Seghers, D‘Agostino et al 2004); (Grabner, Janke et al 2006)); and (3) to function as a reference for a particular population group in order to study intra- and inter-group variability or growth (Thompson and Toga 2002; Gerig, Davis et al 2006). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale behind building a population-specific atlas is described in (Mazziotta, Toga et al 2001)); the practical impact of such an atlas on the analysis of functional data is described in Good et al (Good, Johnsrude et al 2001), and its impact on the analysis of pediatric data is given in (Wilke M. 2002), (Wilke M. 2003), and (Kazemi, Moghaddam et al 2007). To reiterate the most important issues, an unbiased brain template is needed (1) to provide a registration target for automatic image processing techniques (e.g., those in (Evans, Collins et al 1993), (Collins, Neelin et al 1994), and (Thompson and Toga 2002)); (2) to act as an atlas for volume estimation of brain regions (Amit, Grenander et al 1991); (Christensen, Rabbitt et al 1994); (Collins, Zijdenbos et al 1999); (Mazziotta, Toga et al 2001); (Mazziotta, Toga et al 2001); (Toga and Thompson 2001); (Thompson and Toga 2002); (Essen and C. 2002) (Thompson and Toga 2002; Toga and Thompson 2007); (Essen and David 2005); (Seghers, D‘Agostino et al 2004); (Grabner, Janke et al 2006)); and (3) to function as a reference for a particular population group in order to study intra- and inter-group variability or growth (Thompson and Toga 2002; Gerig, Davis et al 2006). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast the probabilistic and statistical side of the deformable template framework has received less attention. In Amit et al (1991) a coherent probabilistic deformable model was proposed using Gaussian random vector fields to model the deformation process with independent and identically distributed (IID) noise added to the deformed template at the observation pixels, but no proposals were offered for estimating the relevant parameters. In general very little can be found on estimating a dense deformable model from a relatively small training set of images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second class of algorithms, known as active contour 13 or deformable models 14 , finds features in the image by evolving a contour under the action of internal and external forces (Fig. 1d).…”
Section: Isolating Cells From Images: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%