2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9nr09395h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural identification of percolation of nanoparticles

Abstract: Percolation is identified with a static scattering method on the scale of 1/qmin (here micron size), in agreement with rheological measurements of the storage modulus, and supported by electron microscopy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To mark the ϕ D→A , we quantify the extent of nanorod aggregation by calculating the weight-averaged aggregation number ⟨N agg 2 ⟩/⟨N agg ⟩. 18,57 In Figure 5a−5c, the plots of log(⟨N agg 2 ⟩/⟨N agg ⟩) as a function of ϕ ranging from 0.10 to 0.20 show the dispersion to aggregation transition as a function of ϕ for all roughnesses. We mark ϕ D→A by the value of ϕ at which the log(⟨N agg 2 ⟩/⟨N agg ⟩) increases sharply (e.g., for N = 80 and roughness 4, the ϕ D→A = 0.17).…”
Section: T H Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To mark the ϕ D→A , we quantify the extent of nanorod aggregation by calculating the weight-averaged aggregation number ⟨N agg 2 ⟩/⟨N agg ⟩. 18,57 In Figure 5a−5c, the plots of log(⟨N agg 2 ⟩/⟨N agg ⟩) as a function of ϕ ranging from 0.10 to 0.20 show the dispersion to aggregation transition as a function of ϕ for all roughnesses. We mark ϕ D→A by the value of ϕ at which the log(⟨N agg 2 ⟩/⟨N agg ⟩) increases sharply (e.g., for N = 80 and roughness 4, the ϕ D→A = 0.17).…”
Section: T H Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented so far describing the effect of varying nanorod roughness on positional and orientational order with increasing ϕ lead us to hypothesize that for each nanorod roughness the PNC undergoes a dispersed to aggregated phase transition with increasing ϕ and that this dispersion–aggregation transition volume fraction, ϕ D→A , increases with nanorod roughness. To mark the ϕ D→A , we quantify the extent of nanorod aggregation by calculating the weight-averaged aggregation number ⟨ N agg 2 ⟩/⟨ N agg ⟩. , In Figure a–c, the plots of log­(⟨ N agg 2 ⟩/⟨ N agg ⟩) as a function of ϕ ranging from 0.10 to 0.20 show the dispersion to aggregation transition as a function of ϕ for all roughnesses. We mark ϕ D→A by the value of ϕ at which the log­(⟨ N agg 2 ⟩/⟨ N agg ⟩) increases sharply (e.g., for N = 80 and roughness 4, the ϕ D→A = 0.17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify these aspects, the structure of polymer nanocomposites is usually characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), [13][14][15][16] and in particular small-angle X-ray or neutron scattering (SAXS or SANS), 17 combined with appropriate modelling approaches, [18][19][20][21] possibly including simulations. [22][23] The dynamical properties of PNCs may be studied by broadband dielectric spectroscopy (BDS) [24][25][26][27] or NMR. [28][29] These techniques average over the macroscopic response of the samples to external fields, without spatial resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can guide us to determine the critical distance . Musino et al 41 investigated closest distance (range is from 0.4 to 2.0 radius of the fillers) between fillers to define as an aggregate. None of the studies discussed how critical distance depends on the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Recent developments in small-angle X-ray scattering technology make it possible to predict fillers' size, shape, and distribution in soft polymeric materials. Musino et al 41 correlate rheological measurements to SAXS analysis to determine at which concentration percolation threshold is achieved. Based on the calculated percolation threshold, they define aggregates in the system.…”
Section: Definition Of An Agglomeratementioning
confidence: 99%