2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-016-0069-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Health Monitoring-Oriented Finite-Element Model for a Large Transmission Tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we should not disregard the fact that some discrepancies still exist between measured and computed modal frequencies after parameter identification. These discrepancies are probably caused by (1) the FE model’s basic configuration partly deviates from the physical truth, for example, the soil–pile–structure interaction is not considered (Cheng et al, 2016) and (2) the ambient modal test might be inaccurate due to many influences, for example, the measurement noise, the temperature variation, the effect of the modal identification method, and so on (Cheng et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we should not disregard the fact that some discrepancies still exist between measured and computed modal frequencies after parameter identification. These discrepancies are probably caused by (1) the FE model’s basic configuration partly deviates from the physical truth, for example, the soil–pile–structure interaction is not considered (Cheng et al, 2016) and (2) the ambient modal test might be inaccurate due to many influences, for example, the measurement noise, the temperature variation, the effect of the modal identification method, and so on (Cheng et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it has been found by our previous study that the material properties for the four upright main chords have more significant influence on low-order modal frequencies than parameters for other parts (Cheng et al, 2016), 20 sets of Young’s modulus for beam-end connections distributed along the four main chords are selected for parameter identification considering the symmetry of structural configuration (P1–P20 in Figure 3), including 8 sets of Young’s modulus for flange joints and 12 for weld joints. Each beam-end connection covers 3.5–4.5 m of the main chord in length as shown in the local enlarged drawing in Figure 3.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although tower structures have been reinforced with better construction technology and stronger materials, the risk of structural accidents cannot be avoided [29]. Several studies have focused on the structural health monitoring of tower-like structures [30][31][32]; however, the accuracy of damage detection is seriously interfered with by the complex operating environment, including temperature and wind load. e number of tower and mast structures located in one urban district is relatively large, and the structural form of each tower and mast structure is simple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], a modal identification method without cable was studied in a laboratory environment, but in practice, cable is not negligible. Reference [17] established a finite element model for the health monitoring of the tower structure of a 131-metre large transmission tower and obtained the conclusion that the ladder, steel plate and bolt have no influence on the overall stiffness of the tower. Reference [18] proposed an optimization method for the installation position of an acceleration sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%