2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural health monitoring for GFRP composite by the piezoresistive response in the tufted reinforcements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tightening of the braid structure is reasonably expected to increase the number and contact cross section of electrical connections along the length of the braid. Other studies investigating the electrical resistance of carbon fibre z-pin and tufts have also experience a similar response due to initial loading [3], [43].…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Of Micro-braided Threadsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This tightening of the braid structure is reasonably expected to increase the number and contact cross section of electrical connections along the length of the braid. Other studies investigating the electrical resistance of carbon fibre z-pin and tufts have also experience a similar response due to initial loading [3], [43].…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Of Micro-braided Threadsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, in the majority of relevant papers, the results of experimental laboratory tests done on small specimens or coupons and numerical simulations are presented. These results are easily available in many journals and selected recent examples of this research can be found in references [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Similar papers dealing with problems on a slightly bigger scale (aircraft panels) are available in references [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In-situ monitoring, though, has some disadvantages, such as manufacturing/embedding difficulties [24], or intrusiveness risks as the integrated device may degrade the mechanical properties of the monitored part [25]. Different types of devices have already been embedded into composite structures to perform insitu SHM, such as optical fibers ( [26,27]: monitoring of cracks), or piezoresistive elements including conductive fiber reinforcement ( [28]: delamination identification), conductivecoated fibers ( [29]: strain monitoring under cyclic flexural loading), nanofillers ( [30]: relation electrical resistance vs. mechanical loading [31]: uniaxial tension-tension fatigue monitoring), Z-pins ( [32]: delamination crack surveillance), and tuft threads ( [33]: tufted 'Omega' stiffener monitoring). Piezoelectric devices are also particularly investigated in the in-situ SHM literature, with the use of PolyVinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) [34] or Lead Zirconate Titanate (LZT or PZT) [17] as primary base materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%