2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural health monitoring by a new hybrid feature extraction and dynamic time warping methods under ambient vibration and non-stationary signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e type, the geometric parameters, and the outer characteristic fault characteristic order of fault bearing are shown in Table 3. e outer ring fault characteristic order F COO and F COI can be calculated according to the geometric parameters of the bearing [18]:…”
Section: Validity Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e type, the geometric parameters, and the outer characteristic fault characteristic order of fault bearing are shown in Table 3. e outer ring fault characteristic order F COO and F COI can be calculated according to the geometric parameters of the bearing [18]:…”
Section: Validity Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, Zhen et al [17] analyzed the stator current signal of the motor driver fault using the DTW method. In 2019, Entezami and Shariatmadar [18] proposed a correlation-based DTW method to detect damage by using randomly high-dimensional multivariate features. e experimental results suggest that this method can detect and locate the damage under the nonstationary signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, novelty detection based on unsupervised learning, which is to be contrasted with supervised learning [10,11], is an influential method for feature classification. Statistical distances [4,[12][13][14], clustering algorithms [15] and artificial neural networks [16] are popular tools for developing novelty detectors for SHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliable way to attain this latter goal is to adopt a well-established statistical distance metric to measure the discrepancy between different sets of samples. Successful approaches used for damage diagnosis relied upon the Mahalanobis-squared distance, [40][41][42][43] the Itakura and cepstral distances, 44 the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), 45,46 the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test (KSTS), 47,48 dynamic time warping, 49 the multivariate distance correlation, 32 and damage indices such as the Fisher criterion, 50 Q-statistic and T2-statistic, 51 and the deflection coefficient (DC). 52 All the aforementioned methods can be exploited through machine learning tools, in either supervised or unsupervised learning manners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%