“…Although these previous studies were the first to reveal the difference in crustal thickness, they did not provide any reasons or interpretations to explain the difference. None of the previous geological and geophysical studies have mentioned the difference in crustal thickness between the two major terranes (see Milsom, 2011;Morley et al, 2011) Information gained from the receiver functions studies such as the crustal thickness and the Vp/Vs ratio has been known to be very powerful. They can provide clues and can be the key to a better understanding of the crustal composition, the crustal deformation/evolution between or in the upper crust and lower crust, magmatic underplating, and obtaining a isostatic relationship between the crust and upper mantle (e.g., Assumpcao et al, 2002;Christensen and Mooney, 1995;Nair et al, 2006;Nguyen et al, 2013;Tian and Zhang, 2013;Tugeme et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2007;Yuan et al, 2002;Zandt and Ammon, 1995).…”