Structural Framework for Performance-Based Assessment of ATM Systems

Lee, Seung Man; Feigh, Karen M.; Volovoi, Vitali

doi:10.2514/6.2009-7055

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Taxonomy Of Adaptations1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research has shown that the allocation of partial functionality to automation actually changes the nature of the work for the operator because the assignment and responsibility have been split (Billings, 1997; Miller & Parasuraman, 2007; Parasuraman et al, 2000; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997; Woods, 1996). The split between assignment and responsibility adds additional “induced” functions such as monitoring, communicating, and coordinating (Lee, Kim, & Feigh, 2009).…”

Section: Taxonomy Of Adaptationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a Characterization of Adaptive Systems

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Taxonomy Of Adaptationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a Characterization of Adaptive Systems

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mixed-Initiative Control of a Roadable Air Vehicle for Non-Pilots

Dorneich

Letsu-Dake

Singh

et al. 2015

Journal of Human-Robot Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work developed and evaluated a human-machine interface for the control of a roadable air vehicle (RAV), capable of surface driving, vertical takeoff, sustained flight, and landing. Military applications seek to combine the benefits of ground and air vehicles to maximize flexibility of movement but require that the operator have minimal pilot training. This makes the operator vulnerable to automation complexity issues; however, the operator will expect to be able to interact extensively and control the vehicle during flight. A mixed-initiative control approach mitigates these vulnerabilities by integrating the operator into many complex control domains in the way that they often expect-flexibly in charge, aware, but not required to issue every command. Intrinsic safety aspects were evaluated by comparing performance, decision making, precision, and workload for three RAV control paradigms: human-only, fully automated, and mixed-initiative control. The results suggest that the mixed-initiative paradigm leverages the benefits of human and automated control while also avoiding the drawbacks associated with each.

show abstract

Structural Framework for Performance-Based Assessment of ATM Systems

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Toward a Characterization of Adaptive Systems

Toward a Characterization of Adaptive Systems

Mixed-Initiative Control of a Roadable Air Vehicle for Non-Pilots

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About