Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity. 2000
DOI: 10.1037/10357-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural features of the self-concept and adjustment.

Abstract: Psychologists' view of the self-concept has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past two decades (Markus & Wurf, 1987). Early researchers treated the self-concept as a unitary, monolithic entity and typically focused their research efforts on a single aspect: self-esteem (Wylie, 1979). In contrast, contemporary theorists rely on a multifaceted, dynamic construal in which the self-concept is defined as a cognitive schema-that is, as an organized knowledge structure that contains beliefs about one's a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since self-esteem is the evaluative component of the self-concept (Campbell et al 2000;Campbell et al 1996), fit will be achieved when task performance and consequences enable the individual to view self in a manner consistent with the evaluation of self that comprises the self-concept.…”
Section: Relationship Between Sc-j Fit and Meaningful Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since self-esteem is the evaluative component of the self-concept (Campbell et al 2000;Campbell et al 1996), fit will be achieved when task performance and consequences enable the individual to view self in a manner consistent with the evaluation of self that comprises the self-concept.…”
Section: Relationship Between Sc-j Fit and Meaningful Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine this construct, these researchers have developed a measure of SCD in which individuals describe the personality traits they possess across a variety of important social roles. Although similar in some respects to Linville’s (1985) self-complexity measure described in Study 2, an important difference in the two measures is that Linville’s procedure asks respondents to spontaneously generate self-aspects of any of a variety of types, whereas Donahue and colleagues’ (1993) measure presents individuals with a particular context in which to describe themselves and calculates the overlap in self-descriptions across these contexts (see Campbell, Assanand, & Di Paula, 2000, and Lutz & Ross, 2003, for a more detailed discussion of differences in these two measures of self-structure). Thus, measurement of SCD is particularly suitable for examining self-concept consistency.…”
Section: Study 3: Scdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This description of self would be based upon your selfconcept. Self-concept is often described as an organized collection of thoughts and beliefs about who we are as a person (Campbell et al 2000). When we start talking about self, we encounter lots of descriptive labels such as self-identity, self-concept, self-esteem, self-efficacy, self-awareness, and the list can go on and on.…”
Section: Self-identitymentioning
confidence: 99%