2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural evolution of the southern transfer zone of the Gulf of Suez rift, Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3-Southern Province: this province is bounded from the north by the Morgan hinge zone bathing from the northern end of Esh El Mellaha to Ras Shukheir to the north of Muzhil. The regional dip of strata is towards southwest as the Northern Province and the main Clysmic and cross faults throw towards northeast and southeast, respectively [43].…”
Section: Structure Of the Gos Riftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-Southern Province: this province is bounded from the north by the Morgan hinge zone bathing from the northern end of Esh El Mellaha to Ras Shukheir to the north of Muzhil. The regional dip of strata is towards southwest as the Northern Province and the main Clysmic and cross faults throw towards northeast and southeast, respectively [43].…”
Section: Structure Of the Gos Riftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rifting of the Gulf of Suez started during the Lower Miocene due to the divergent movement between the African plate and the Arabian plate which created a series of NW-SE to NNW-SSE trending normal faults (Patton et al 1994;Omran 1995;Abul Karamat and Meshref 2002;Bosworth et al 2005). The faulted blocks of the Gulf of Suez are bounded mainly by NW normal faults and connected to each other by WNW-, NNE-and NE-oriented faults (Abd-Allah et al 2014). The syn-rift Miocene deposit in the Gulf of Suez province changes laterally from clastic sediments to more deeply buried sediments towards the rift axis (Bosworth and McClay 2001).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The syn-rift Miocene deposit in the Gulf of Suez province changes laterally from clastic sediments to more deeply buried sediments towards the rift axis (Bosworth and McClay 2001). Due to the tilt of the pre-rift blocks, the Miocene rocks overlying the different pre-rift units vary in lithologies and thicknesses (Abd-Allah et al 2014). The structure of Abu Rudeis-Sidri area is an asymmetrical NW-SE trending anticlinal feature separated by a number of NW-SE fault systems and formed during the late Oligocene-Early Miocene time (rifting phase) (Zahra and Nakhla 2016b).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The faulted blocks at the Gulf of Suez rift bounded primarily by NW normal faults which are connected to each other by NNE-, NE-and WNW-oriented faults (Abd-Allah et al 2014).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The syn-rift Miocene rocks in the Gulf of Suez area change laterally from clastics (conglomerate and sandstone) to more deeper sediments (sandstone, marl, shale, limestone and evaporates) towards the rift axis (Bosworth and McClay 2001). Tilting of the pre-rift blocks made the Miocene rocks resting on the different pre-rift units and vary in lithologies and thicknesses (Abd-Allah et al 2014).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%