2011
DOI: 10.1029/2009tc002656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural evolution of a composite middle to lower crustal section: The Sierra de Pie de Palo, northwest Argentina

Abstract: The Sierra de Pie de Palo of northwest Argentina preserves middle to lower crustal metamorphic rocks that were penetratively deformed during Ordovician accretion of the Precordillera terrane to the Gondwana margin. New structural, petrologic, and geochronologic data from a 40 km structural transect reveals that the Sierra de Pie de Palo preserves a middle to lower crustal ductile thrust complex consisting of individual structural units and not an intact ophiolite and cover sequence. Top‐to‐the‐west thrusting o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
96
0
17

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(89 reference statements)
5
96
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Western Sierras Pampeanas, Nappe structures were also recognized and described in the Sierra de Pie de Palo by Ramos et al (1996) and, more recently, by van Staal et al (2011), Mulcahy et al (2011) and references therein. These authors cited the Ordovician collisional history to explain the nappen structures (van Staal et al, 2011) and the composite middle to lower crustal section (Mulcahy et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussion and Geotectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Western Sierras Pampeanas, Nappe structures were also recognized and described in the Sierra de Pie de Palo by Ramos et al (1996) and, more recently, by van Staal et al (2011), Mulcahy et al (2011) and references therein. These authors cited the Ordovician collisional history to explain the nappen structures (van Staal et al, 2011) and the composite middle to lower crustal section (Mulcahy et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussion and Geotectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These authors cited the Ordovician collisional history to explain the nappen structures (van Staal et al, 2011) and the composite middle to lower crustal section (Mulcahy et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussion and Geotectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kay et al 1996;Thomas et al 2012) or of an autochthonous Arequipa-Pampia terrane (e.g. Casquet et al 2006;Rapela et al 2010;Mulcahy et al 2011). If the southern transport model, which involves zircon transport from the Western Sierras Pampeanas from late Cambrian and throughout Palaeozoic time, is correct, it implies that the Western Sierras Pampeanas were attached to Gondwana, supporting the existence of Arequipa-Pampia (Bahlburg et al 2000).…”
Section: Continent Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In any hypothesis, docking of this terrane to the margin of Gondwana occurred in the midOrdovician during the Famatinian orogeny (Ramos et al, 1998;Casquet et al, 2001;Galindo et al, 2004;Ramos, 2004). Overlying the Pie de Palo complex is an imbricate thrust system that reworked basement consisting of Late Mesoproterozoic orthogneisses and metasedimentary rocks overlain by a Neoproterozoic sedimentary cover (Casquet et al, 2001;Mulcahy et al, 2011). This basement underwent pre-Famatinian metamorphism under conditions close to those of the Maz terrane, to which it is probably equivalent (Casquet et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Mesoproterozoic Evolution Of the Mara Cratonmentioning
confidence: 96%