Structural Evaluation of the State of Power Losses in 0.4-220kV Electrical Networks of Khatlon Region, Republic of Tajikistan

Chorshanbiev, Sirojiddin R.; Ismoilov, Firdavs O.; Sangov, Khushdil S.; Madzhidov, Gafurzhon H.; Shvedov, Galaktion V.

doi:10.1109/eiconrus49466.2020.9039394

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Model Validation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature consulted relies on other calculation models or on official values of institutions to contrast or verify their results [11][12][13].…”

Section: Model Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mathematical Model for the Evaluation of Technical Losses in Sub transmission Electrical Networks

Maliuk¹,

Maliukr²,

Pérez³

et al. 2020

IJETAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to studies carried out, it is estimated that electrical losses due to ohmic effect in conductors can reach up to 70% of the total losses in electrical systems. In the work, a mathematical model is established for the evaluation of technical losses in subtransmission networks of the Holguín province, which considers the effective length of the circuit, the resistance in the conductors and the number of clients connected to said circuit. This calculation model allows, on the basis of the general information available from the circuit (global information), to evaluate the losses, establishing certain simplifications with respect to traditional methods. The results obtained were verified with those of the Radial software. The statistical results indicate that there are no significant differences in means, so the model calculates practical results similar to Radial.

show abstract

“…The literature consulted relies on other calculation models or on official values of institutions to contrast or verify their results [11][12][13].…”

Section: Model Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%