Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b08630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Elucidation of Bisulfite Adducts to Pseudouridine That Result in Deletion Signatures during Reverse Transcription of RNA

Abstract: The recent report of RBS-Seq to map simultaneously the epitranscriptomic modifications N 1 -methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, and pseudouridine (Ψ) via bisulfite treatment of RNA provides a key advance to locate these important modifications. The locations of Ψ were found by a deletion signature generated during cDNA synthesis after bisulfite treatment for which the chemical details of the reaction are poorly understood. In the present work, the bisulfite reaction with Ψ was explored to identify six isomers o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(149 reference statements)
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 As a result of analyzing sequencing stops, these approaches cannot achieve read-through in order to sequence multiple sites simultaneously in single strands; additionally, RNA structure-induced stops can yield false positives, and quantification of the modification is challenging to conduct accurately using these approaches. 19 , 20 One chemical solution is to treat the suspect RNA with bisulfite to yield a stable sugar adduct on the Ψ nucleotide, 21 , 22 which induces a deletion signature during cDNA synthesis, allowing more than one modification per strand to be sequenced. However, this approach does not yield quantitative deletions, and therefore, the extent of modification at suspected sites is challenging to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 18 As a result of analyzing sequencing stops, these approaches cannot achieve read-through in order to sequence multiple sites simultaneously in single strands; additionally, RNA structure-induced stops can yield false positives, and quantification of the modification is challenging to conduct accurately using these approaches. 19 , 20 One chemical solution is to treat the suspect RNA with bisulfite to yield a stable sugar adduct on the Ψ nucleotide, 21 , 22 which induces a deletion signature during cDNA synthesis, allowing more than one modification per strand to be sequenced. However, this approach does not yield quantitative deletions, and therefore, the extent of modification at suspected sites is challenging to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudouridine (Ψ), the most abundant global RNA modification, is an isomerization product of uridine (U) found at high relative levels (>1%) in eukaryotic tRNA and rRNA, as well as in viral RNA, and lower levels (<1%) in eukaryotic mRNA (Figure A). ,, This modification is tied to critical RNA functions in cells such as reinforcing RNA secondary structure and regulation of translation, and Ψ levels change in response to oxidative, micronutrient, or heat-shock stress. , Initially, Ψ was located in RNA via digestion and chromatographic methods followed by mass spectrometric quantification approaches, and recently, high-throughput NGS using Ψ-specific chemistry has revealed sites in the mammalian transcriptome for Ψ. Pseudouridine is specifically alkylated by the carbodiimide CMC ( N -cyclohexyl- N ′-(2-morpholinoethyl)­carbodiimide metho-p-toluenesulfonate) to yield a stable and bulky adduct to stall reverse transcription, which is found by distinct sequencing read stops in comparison to a nonalkylated matched control. , Alternatively, Ψ can be sequenced by the absence of reactivity with hydrazine, while the parent U readily reacts to yield strand breaks detected during NGS . As a result of analyzing sequencing stops, these approaches cannot achieve read-through in order to sequence multiple sites simultaneously in single strands; additionally, RNA structure-induced stops can yield false positives, and quantification of the modification is challenging to conduct accurately using these approaches. , One chemical solution is to treat the suspect RNA with bisulfite to yield a stable sugar adduct on the Ψ nucleotide, , which induces a deletion signature during cDNA synthesis, allowing more than one modification per strand to be sequenced. However, this approach does not yield quantitative deletions, and therefore, the extent of modification at suspected sites is challenging to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 As a result of analyzing sequencing stops, these approaches cannot achieve read-through in order to sequence multiple sites in single strands; additionally, RNA structure-induced stops can yield false positives, and quantification of the modification is challenging to conduct accurately using these approaches. 18,19 One chemical solution is to treat the suspect RNA with bisulfite to yield a stable sugar adduct on the Ψ nucleotide, 20,21 which induces a deletion signature during cDNA synthesis, allowing more than one modification per strand to be sequenced. However, this approach does not yield quantitative deletions, and therefore, the extent of modification at suspected sites is challenging to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new developments have demonstrated the power of chemical nucleoside conversion to study cellular RNA dynamics upon RNA‐seq . Currently, 4sU is the dominantly used nucleoside for metabolic labeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%