We report on detailed microscopy studies of graphene and few-layer-graphene produced by mechanical exfoliation on various semi-conducting substrates. We demonstrate the possibility to prepare and analyze graphene on (001)-GaAs, manganese p-doped (001)-GaAs and InGaAs substrates. The morphology of graphene on these substrates was investigated by scanning electron and atomic force microscopy and compared to layers on SiO2. It was found that graphene sheets strongly follow the texture of the sustaining substrates independent on doping, polarity or roughness. Furthermore resist residues exist on top of graphene after a lithographic step. The obtained results provide the opportunity to research the graphene-substrate interactions.
PACS numbers:Since the discovery of graphene sheets in 2004 a wealth of unusual properties of this gapless semiconductor has been explored experimentally [1,2,3,4,5]. Theoretically, graphene as a building block of graphite has been studied extensively, starting from the middle of the past century [6,7,8]. Even though 3D graphite is an abundant material with many applications, the way to 2D graphene took a long time [1,9]. The start to this area of research was the discovery that mechanically exfoliated graphene sheets are visible under an optical microscope, if an oxidized silicon wafer with a certain thickness of oxide is used as a substrate. Nowadays, even the number of graphene layers can be determined by optical inspection. Therefore, most experimental studies rely on oxidized silicon as a substrate. Spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy can distinguish between single layer, bilayer and multilayer graphene and was also performed to study the influence of the substrate on the Raman scattering spectrum [10,11] of graphene by investigating the graphene-substrate phonon coupling. The substrate was shown to be limiting the carrier mobility in experiments with freely suspended graphene sheets [12,13], where the mobility was increased by a factor of ten. While this clearly works as an impressive proof of concept, device applications requiring high mobilities cannot be realized in this way, and alternative substrates need to be explored. For instance, GaAs or InGaAs substrates, where the dielectric constant is much higher than in SiO 2 , could have shorter screening lengths of charged impurities. Further possibilities of taking advantage of a suitable choice of substrate were suggested in recent theory articles. For example, single layer graphene deposited on a boron nitride surface could develop an energy gap [14]. Using a manganese doped substrate for bilayer graphene preparation should also lead to a gap and even to a highly spin polarized state [15], which would be ground-breaking for * Electronic address: Ulrich.Stoeberl@physik.uni-r.de † present address: Department of Physics, University of Hamburg spintronics in carbon-based devices.In this letter we report our experimental studies on the influence of different kinds of substrates on the morphology of graphene and few layer graphene usin...