2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.084004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of CrTe2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been utilized as the basis for a high-throughput DFT study to stabilize monolayers that exhibit structural instabilities in C2DB . Finally, accounting for strong electron correlations through a Hubbard U as low as 1 eV has been found to stabilize the imaginary phonon modes in 1T-CrTe 2 . However, considering the aforementioned approaches to stabilizing the materials generated here go beyond the scope of this work; our aim is to provide motivation and a blueprint for accelerating the discovery and screening of materials with specified properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been utilized as the basis for a high-throughput DFT study to stabilize monolayers that exhibit structural instabilities in C2DB . Finally, accounting for strong electron correlations through a Hubbard U as low as 1 eV has been found to stabilize the imaginary phonon modes in 1T-CrTe 2 . However, considering the aforementioned approaches to stabilizing the materials generated here go beyond the scope of this work; our aim is to provide motivation and a blueprint for accelerating the discovery and screening of materials with specified properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the CrTe 2 monolayer with strain-free was a FM state. After the tensile strain was applied, its T C could rise to 1022.8 K [ 106 ], and the magnetic moment of Cr atom increased linearly, which may be caused by the increase of the density of states at Fermi energy N EF . Magnetic anisotropy exhibited a different sensitivity to uniaxial and biaxial strain, as shown in Figure 4 l. A monolayer was more sensitive to tensile strain, while a bilayer was more sensitive to compressive strain, and bulk was insensitive to the applied strain.…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the bilayer, values for Te atoms at the van der Waals gap (Te v ) and Te atoms at the free surface Te s are shown. (Reproduced with permission from [ 106 ]. Copyright 2022, American Physical Society).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%