“…However, cryo‐EM structures of full‐length GluD1 (Burada, Vinnakota, & Kumar, 2020a) and GluD2 (Burada, Vinnakota, & Kumar, 2020b) receptors revealed a distinct domain arrangement in the receptor tetramer when compared to other families of ionotropic glutamate receptors (Figure 1). Unlike AMPA (Sobolevsky, Rosconi, & Gouaux, 2009), kainate (Kumari et al, 2020; Kumari, Vinnakota, & Kumar, 2019; Meyerson et al, 2014) and NMDA (Karakas & Furukawa, 2014) receptors, where the dimer partners at the amino terminal domain and ligand binding domain layer are swapped between the distal and proximal subunits of the receptor tetramer, GluD receptors adopt a non‐swapped architecture (Figure 1). While disrupted amino terminal domain dimer‐of‐dimer interface has been observed previously in AMPA (Dürr et al, 2014; Meyerson et al, 2014; Nakagawa, Cheng, Ramm, Sheng, & Walz, 2005; Zhao, Chen, Swensen, Qian, & Gouaux, 2019) and NMDA receptors (Jalali‐Yazdi, Chowdhury, Yoshioka, & Gouaux, 2018; Zhu et al, 2016), the non‐swapped architecture is unique to GluD receptors.…”