2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural dynamics of the GluK3-kainate receptor neurotransmitter binding domains revealed by cryo-EM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 A ˚of GluK2 in the presence of the competitive antagonist LY466195 that was reminiscent of the closed-state structure of GluA2 (Meyerson et al, 2016). More recently, low-resolution structures of GluK3 were obtained in the presence of kainate or SYM2081 as well as competitive antagonists UBP301 and UBP310, with the latter showing significant asymmetric distortions at the ABD layer (Kumari et al, 2019(Kumari et al, , 2020. The gating mechanism of kainate receptors is unknown because neither the apo nor the open-state structures of kainate receptors have been resolved.…”
Section: A Subunit Stoichiometry and Domain Organizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 A ˚of GluK2 in the presence of the competitive antagonist LY466195 that was reminiscent of the closed-state structure of GluA2 (Meyerson et al, 2016). More recently, low-resolution structures of GluK3 were obtained in the presence of kainate or SYM2081 as well as competitive antagonists UBP301 and UBP310, with the latter showing significant asymmetric distortions at the ABD layer (Kumari et al, 2019(Kumari et al, , 2020. The gating mechanism of kainate receptors is unknown because neither the apo nor the open-state structures of kainate receptors have been resolved.…”
Section: A Subunit Stoichiometry and Domain Organizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The gating mechanism of kainate receptors is unknown because neither the apo nor the open-state structures of kainate receptors have been resolved. When compared with the closed-state AMPA receptor structure, the putative desensitized state structures of kainate receptors predict unusually large conformational changes associated with desensitization (Meyerson et al, 2014(Meyerson et al, , 2016Kumari et al, 2019Kumari et al, , 2020. Recently, the cryo-EM structure of GluK2/5 heteromer was solved in the apo, antagonistbound, and desensitized states (Khanra et al, 2021).…”
Section: A Subunit Stoichiometry and Domain Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to structurally resolve the architecture of tetrameric kainate receptors have led to low-resolution structures of the GluK3 receptor in complex with kainate or the antagonists UBP301 and UBP310 [34,35], along with cryo-EM structures of the heterotetramer associated with L-Glu or the antagonist CNQX (Figure 2) [36]. This allowed the characterization of changes occurring during the activation of the kainate receptor.…”
Section: Activity Of Kainate Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cryo‐EM structures of full‐length GluD1 (Burada, Vinnakota, & Kumar, 2020a) and GluD2 (Burada, Vinnakota, & Kumar, 2020b) receptors revealed a distinct domain arrangement in the receptor tetramer when compared to other families of ionotropic glutamate receptors (Figure 1). Unlike AMPA (Sobolevsky, Rosconi, & Gouaux, 2009), kainate (Kumari et al, 2020; Kumari, Vinnakota, & Kumar, 2019; Meyerson et al, 2014) and NMDA (Karakas & Furukawa, 2014) receptors, where the dimer partners at the amino terminal domain and ligand binding domain layer are swapped between the distal and proximal subunits of the receptor tetramer, GluD receptors adopt a non‐swapped architecture (Figure 1). While disrupted amino terminal domain dimer‐of‐dimer interface has been observed previously in AMPA (Dürr et al, 2014; Meyerson et al, 2014; Nakagawa, Cheng, Ramm, Sheng, & Walz, 2005; Zhao, Chen, Swensen, Qian, & Gouaux, 2019) and NMDA receptors (Jalali‐Yazdi, Chowdhury, Yoshioka, & Gouaux, 2018; Zhu et al, 2016), the non‐swapped architecture is unique to GluD receptors.…”
Section: Distinct Architecture and Domain Organization Of Glud Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%