2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.1291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Dynamics is a Determinant of the Functional Significance of Missense Variants

Abstract: Accurate evaluation of the effect of point mutations on protein function is essential to assessing the genesis and prognosis of many inherited diseases and cancer types. Currently, a wealth of computational tools has been developed for pathogenicity prediction. Two major types of data are used to this aim: sequence conservation/ evolution and structural properties. Here, we demonstrate in a systematic way that another determinant of the functional impact of missense variants is the protein's structural dynamic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B‐factor values of atomic coordinates in crystal structures (Sun, Liu, Qu, Feng, & Reetz, ), NMR order parameters (Torchia, ) or fluctuation calculated from an alignment of multiple X‐ray structures, or NMR‐derived ensembles allows straightforward estimates on flexibility. Conformational flexibility estimated through MD has also been used as one of the many features in predicting for effects of a missense mutation (Ponzoni & Bahar, ), but not in a direct manner as us. We look at altered flexibility; therefore, if any protein segment, including nonflexible segment, if altered in flexibility, those effects are accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B‐factor values of atomic coordinates in crystal structures (Sun, Liu, Qu, Feng, & Reetz, ), NMR order parameters (Torchia, ) or fluctuation calculated from an alignment of multiple X‐ray structures, or NMR‐derived ensembles allows straightforward estimates on flexibility. Conformational flexibility estimated through MD has also been used as one of the many features in predicting for effects of a missense mutation (Ponzoni & Bahar, ), but not in a direct manner as us. We look at altered flexibility; therefore, if any protein segment, including nonflexible segment, if altered in flexibility, those effects are accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we integrated scores and generated topologic groups that we believe may indicate different molecular mechanisms and thereby probabilities of pathogenicity, but more quantitative groups generated by training against experimental functional assays is required for a more definitive assessment. Earlier studies have shown the importance of protein 3D structure [5,23,24] and dynamics [4] in the prediction functional impact of missense variants, in general. However, no study, to our knowledge, has combined these diverse scores together, or with DNA annotations, for the interpretation of genomic variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental concept underlying this idea is that the structure and dynamics of RNA and proteins ultimately determine whether a variation can be tolerated or becomes pathogenic. Further, current approaches aim to directly predict pathogenicity resulting in different levels of predictive performance [3][4][5]. We believe that this approach bypasses the necessary step of determining the molecular mechanism of dysfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study tested the performance of 14 tools (SEQ+DYN, SEQ, DYN, MutationTaster2, PolyPhen2, MutationAssessor, CADD, SIFT, LRT, FATHMM-U, Gerp++, phyloP, Condel, Logit) in relation to structural dynamics, which was used as a proxy for functional significance of amino acid substitutions [46]. PON-P2 has the best sensitivity, specificity, NPV and MMC, it is the second best for accuracy but only 13 th for PPV.…”
Section: Benchmark Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%