2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Domains in the Type III Restriction Endonuclease EcoP15I: Characterization by Limited Proteolysis, Mass Spectrometry and Insertional Mutagenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These sites can be several thousands of base pairs apart and under standard conditions cleavage occurs 24–28 bp in 3′-direction from one of them (3,5,6). However, very conflicting data exist about the movement of EcoP15I between remote DNA sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These sites can be several thousands of base pairs apart and under standard conditions cleavage occurs 24–28 bp in 3′-direction from one of them (3,5,6). However, very conflicting data exist about the movement of EcoP15I between remote DNA sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results obtained from limited proteolysis experiments and mass spectrometry showed that the Res subunit of EcoP15I is comprised of two stable domains connected by a flexible linker (5). According to these experiments, the N-terminal part (amino acids 40–705) of EcoP15I Res subunit appears to be the motor or translocase domain (Tr) containing conserved helicase motifs, whereas the C-terminal part (amino acids 729–966) is the endonuclease domain (E) carrying the active site responsible for DNA cleavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] It was consistently seen that using an equimolar ratio of EcoP15I proteins to recognition sites resulted in DNA cleavage occurring at only one of the interacting sites where it cuts with considerable imprecision: 24 to 26 bases downstream of 5′-CAGCAG and 26 to 28 bases upstream of 5′-CTGCTG. [6][7][8][9] However, divergent opinions about how the long-distance interaction between the recognition sites is realized currently exist. Some models favour ATP-driven DNA translocation alone 3 or combined with three-dimensional DNA looping, 10,11 and corresponding loop structures have been visualized by atomic force microscopy and fast-scan atomic force microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mt BPL exhibit restricted cleavage in the presence of substrate suggesting that scissile site interacts with the substrate. While the biotin binding site is constituted by the conserved ‘GRGRHGR’ in both the BPLs but binding of biotin/bio-5′AMP promotes conformational change in Ec BirA [28], [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%