1989
DOI: 10.2307/352502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Determinants of the Divorce Rate: A Cross-Societal Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Emigration leads to relative scarcity and greater demand for females in a given prefecture, and so the reduction of divorce, as also Trent & South (1989) and South (1985South ( , 1988 found in their American samples. As regards the direct effect of female immigration, the coefficient is positive but is not statistically significant.…”
Section: The Present Findingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Emigration leads to relative scarcity and greater demand for females in a given prefecture, and so the reduction of divorce, as also Trent & South (1989) and South (1985South ( , 1988 found in their American samples. As regards the direct effect of female immigration, the coefficient is positive but is not statistically significant.…”
Section: The Present Findingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although there are a wide variety of marital relationship patterns around the world, marital stability seems to result from focused cooperation by the marital pair in production and reproduction, in which both of the spouses have some rights in the children. Factors that reduce women's economic dependency 8 and men's investment in their children (e.g. matrilineal inheritance 9 ) increase the level of divorce.…”
Section: Marriage Divorce and The Gender Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a significant rise in the rates of union dissolution in western countries in the post-war period; in Britain the crude divorce rate increased more than 6 fold from 2 per 1000 in 1960 to about 13 per 1000 marriages in 2000 (Chan and Halpin 2003). This trend has largely been attributed to the increase in the economic independence of women, changes in public attitudes toward divorce, and the liberalisation of marriage legislation (Becker 1981;Kierman and Meuller 1999;Thornton 1989;Trent and South 1989). Certain factors, such as getting married at a young age and premarital birth, are positively associated with dissolution, while higher income couples and those with higher qualifications have a lower risk of divorce (Chan and Halpin 2003;Kierian and Meuller 1999;Teachman 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%