2007
DOI: 10.1110/ps.062739107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural determinants of nitroxide motion in spin‐labeled proteins: Tertiary contact and solvent‐inaccessible sites in helix G of T4 lysozyme

Abstract: A nitroxide side chain (R1) has been substituted at single sites along a helix-turn-helix motif in T4 lysozyme (residues 114-135). Together with previously published data, the new sites reported complete a continuous scan through the motif. Mutants with R1 at sites 115 and 118 were selected for crystallographic analysis to identify the structural origins of the corresponding two-component EPR spectra. At 115, R1 is shown to occupy two rotamers in the room temperature crystal structure, one of which has not bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
191
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
15
191
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPR spectra for the selected sites show little or no change upon photoactivation, as previously reported (12,(37)(38)(39)(40). Because the spectra are sensitive to changes in backbone dynamics (41,42) and local interactions within the protein (29)(30)(31)43), the lack of spectral change upon photoactivation strongly suggests that the conformation of R1, the immediate local environment, and the secondary structure to which it is attached remain the same under rhodopsin activation. Thus, changes in interspin distances between pairs of these nitroxides report relative motion of the structures to which they are attached.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EPR spectra for the selected sites show little or no change upon photoactivation, as previously reported (12,(37)(38)(39)(40). Because the spectra are sensitive to changes in backbone dynamics (41,42) and local interactions within the protein (29)(30)(31)43), the lack of spectral change upon photoactivation strongly suggests that the conformation of R1, the immediate local environment, and the secondary structure to which it is attached remain the same under rhodopsin activation. Thus, changes in interspin distances between pairs of these nitroxides report relative motion of the structures to which they are attached.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…1), and interspin distances were measured in the inactive (R) and light-activated state (R*), using DEER spectroscopy. A global analysis of the data localized individual spins in the structure, and the results for R are in excellent agreement with the rhodopsin crystal structure from Li et al [Protein Data Bank (PDB) entry 1GZM] (8) and models of R1 based on the known structure of the side chain (29)(30)(31)(32). For R*, the data reveal an outward motion of R1 in TM6 by 5 Å and smaller movements of R1 in TM1, TM7, and in the C-terminal domain following helix H8.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…1A shows a model of the L121A/L133A mutant based on the crystal structure, along with the location of R1 sensor sites and the spectra compared with those of the WT′. The spectra for the WT′ protein have been published previously and interpreted in terms of the protein structure and dynamics (16)(17)(18)(19)(20); the basic principles of spectral analysis are outlined in SI Materials and Methods. The spectra of 131R1, 132R1, 140R1, and 151R1 in the WT′ reflect a simple anisotropic motion characteristic of R1 at solvent-exposed sites in relatively rigid helical segments, whereas the spectra of 48R1, 109R1, 123R1, 128R1, and 135R1 reflect higher mobility of the nitroxide consistent with their location near or at the helix termini (16).…”
Section: Experimental Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A, Inset) was introduced at solvent-exposed sites to serve as a sensor of local structure. At such sites, R1 typically has weak or no interactions with the protein, as reflected by a singlecomponent electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum, and introduces little structural perturbation (16)(17)(18)(19). The R1 sensor Significance Analysis of protein packing reveals the prevalence of cavities, some of which are evolutionarily conserved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure of the nitroxide side chain R1. The label is linked to the protein backbone through five rotatable bonds; however, interactions between the distal sulfur and the Ca proton 20 restrict rotameric conversions to X4 and X5. 21 differences that are seen between spectroscopic and crystallographic methods and suggest that regions where the two crystal structures of BtuB differ represent sites of conformational exchange.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%