Boron and Refractory Borides 1977
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66620-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Determinants in the Higher Borides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LuB 12 crystallizes in the UB 12 type structure work 23 which can be viewed as a cubic rocksalt arrangement of Lu and B 12 cuboctahedral clusters. The sample preparation process involves synthesising dodecaborides by a borothermal reduction of the metal oxides in vacuum at 1900 K, compacting these powders into rods and subsequently sintering them, then finally inductive zone melting in a high frequency induction zone unit 24 .…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LuB 12 crystallizes in the UB 12 type structure work 23 which can be viewed as a cubic rocksalt arrangement of Lu and B 12 cuboctahedral clusters. The sample preparation process involves synthesising dodecaborides by a borothermal reduction of the metal oxides in vacuum at 1900 K, compacting these powders into rods and subsequently sintering them, then finally inductive zone melting in a high frequency induction zone unit 24 .…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of possessing hardness above 30 GPa, low mass density (2.52 g ∕cm 3 ), and high Hugoniot elastic limit (17-20 GPa), boron carbide (B 4 C) has received considerable attention in ballistic applications (Karandikar et al, 2009). Due to its high melting point and thermal stability (Matkovich et al, 1977), favorable abrasion resistance (Subramanian et al, 2010), and high temperature semiconductivity (Thevenot, 1990), boron carbide excels in refractory, nuclear, and novel electronic applications, respectively; however, its performance is hindered by one or more of a number of inelastic deformation mechanisms, including deformation twinning (Li et al, 2010), stressinduced phase transformations (An et al, 2014;Eremeyev and Fischer, 2010), and various fracture behaviors (An and Goddard III, 2015) when subjected to mechanical stresses exceeding their elastic limit. The key failure mechanisms in boron carbide (e.g., cleavage fracture and twinning) are commonly studied experimentally using numerous characterization techniques (e.g., transmission electron microscopy (Zhao et al, 2016) and Raman spectroscopy (Yan et al, 2009)).…”
Section: Boron Carbidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cubic structure of YB 12 was later confirmed on single crystals [5], but a single crystal of ScB 12 studied in the same work [5] was determined as tetragonal I4/mmm, with unit-cell parameters a tet ≈ 5.22 Å, c tet ≈ 7.35 Å that could be transformed to pseudo-cubic: a = b = a tet √ 2 ≈ 7.38 Å, c = c tet ≈ 7.35 Å. All the above findings were summarized in a review article [6]. A more recent review [7], which was mainly devoted to magnetic, superconducting, and other physical properties of rare-earth dodecaborides, began by describing the dodecaboride structure and by presenting structural information on RB 12 with R = Tb -Lu from the second half of the lanthanide series supplemented with YB 12 and ZrB 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%