1985
DOI: 10.1021/ja00312a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural dependence of the singlet-triplet energy gap of the tetramethylene biradical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems inappropriate to introduce the triplet states in calculations because of the singlet‐triplet transition being spin forbidden by direct absorption, but the triplet state can be populated from above by an excited singlet state 35, 36, which is possible for the present situation. As a matter of fact, Doubleday et al, 37 have introduced triplet state and the triplet‐singlet interaction to discuss the dissociation of tetramethylene diradical in their dynamical model of triplet‐derived tetramethylene derivatives. On the other hand, DFTB calculations used in the simulation is not spin‐polarized, the energy obtained does not correspond to that of a pure spin state, consequently involvement of triplet state together with singlet state will be helpful to interpreting the energy curve obtained by the simulation and comparing the simulation results with those of high‐level ab initio calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems inappropriate to introduce the triplet states in calculations because of the singlet‐triplet transition being spin forbidden by direct absorption, but the triplet state can be populated from above by an excited singlet state 35, 36, which is possible for the present situation. As a matter of fact, Doubleday et al, 37 have introduced triplet state and the triplet‐singlet interaction to discuss the dissociation of tetramethylene diradical in their dynamical model of triplet‐derived tetramethylene derivatives. On the other hand, DFTB calculations used in the simulation is not spin‐polarized, the energy obtained does not correspond to that of a pure spin state, consequently involvement of triplet state together with singlet state will be helpful to interpreting the energy curve obtained by the simulation and comparing the simulation results with those of high‐level ab initio calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the latter intersection the second CC bond breaking does not emerge but the diradical may undergo ISC which will affect the distribution of photodissociation products. If the ISC rate is fast enough, transition between 1 3 A and 1 1 A can easily takes place, and the dissociation of the diradical into two ethylenes will proceed along the singlet ground state S 0 , as Doubleday et al have suggested 37. On the contrary, if the rate is very slow, the triplet diradical has a long lifetime and might be measured as an intermediate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the diradical mechanisms for [212] cycloaddition of ethylene, Doubleday, [37][38][39][40] Lindh and coworkers, 41 and Lischka and coworkers 42 reported that the ring closure of the diradical had little or no barrier when calculated at higher levels of theory, such as CISD, MRCI, MR-AQCC, and CASPT2. To compare the levels of theory used in this work with the best available calculations for the cycloaddition of ethylene, we recalculated the cyclization of ethylene at the same level of theory used in this work, CASPT2 (4, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%