2022
DOI: 10.1177/14759217211072237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural deformation prediction model based on extreme learning machine algorithm and particle swarm optimization

Abstract: In this paper, an extreme learning machine (ELM) algorithm based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) is proposed to predict structural deformation. Taking an aqueduct located in Tiantai County, Zhejiang, China, as a case study, a series of observations of the aqueduct vertical displacements and crack openings were used to train a neural network. Then, variables representing environmental factors (air temperature), hydraulic factors (water level), and aging were selected as the influence factors input into the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Te measured radial deformation of PL13-5 is still taken for illustration. SOA, the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [34], and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [35] are all utilized to search the optimal parameters of the GBDT, respectively, including the number m of trees, the tree depth h, and the learning rate v. Te search space of these parameters is [50, 400], [1,4], and [0, 1], respectively. Te maximum iteration number and the population size of the three algorithms are set to 400 and 30.…”
Section: Comparison Of Diferent Point Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te measured radial deformation of PL13-5 is still taken for illustration. SOA, the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) [34], and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [35] are all utilized to search the optimal parameters of the GBDT, respectively, including the number m of trees, the tree depth h, and the learning rate v. Te search space of these parameters is [50, 400], [1,4], and [0, 1], respectively. Te maximum iteration number and the population size of the three algorithms are set to 400 and 30.…”
Section: Comparison Of Diferent Point Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of research has been done in applying conventional measurement techniques to SHM [15]. Examples include statistical-based deformation health diagnosis models [16][17][18][19] and improved models with extreme learning machine [20], support vector regression (SVR) [21,22], artificial neural networks (ANNs) [23], random forests (RF) [24] and other intelligent algorithms. However, these models cannot explain the physical meaning of dam deformation or reflect the impact of construction interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,42 In hybrid methods, a metaheuristic method obtains the optimal value of the objective function approximately, then this value is used as the initial estimated value by a local search technique to determine the optimal value accurately. Metaheuristic methods such as particle swarm optimization (PSO), 43 genetic algorithms 44 and simulated annealing 45 are usually stochastic in nature and improve a randomly generated set of initial designs in a pseudorandom fashion. 46 This paper investigates the behaviour of a steel cantilever beam with a partially-fixed connection by presenting a FEMU process based on DIC and Powell particle swarm optimization (PPSO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%