2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural damage detection using the transformation matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-destructive testing can be performed in a scheduled and repetitive manner as required, to detect cracks or defects in structural elements. Examples of these elements are aircraft components suffering barely visible impact damage, and bridge and building structures suffering earthquake damage, amongst others [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Types of non-destructive testing include visual inspection, ultrasound and magnetic field tests, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-destructive testing can be performed in a scheduled and repetitive manner as required, to detect cracks or defects in structural elements. Examples of these elements are aircraft components suffering barely visible impact damage, and bridge and building structures suffering earthquake damage, amongst others [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Types of non-destructive testing include visual inspection, ultrasound and magnetic field tests, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, another type of non-destructive technique which can be used to assess structural damage in situ involves the measurement of vibration characteristics, namely the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The presence of cracks in a structural element changes its vibration characteristics and those of the assembled structure [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Natural frequencies can be measured at any chosen point of the structure and are independent of the location of measurements [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the POM data sets extracted from the FRFs with a step of 0.02 Hz in the frequency range of 26-28 Hz at two states before and after the mass 6,7,8,9,10. Each plot has two curves depending on the existence of external noise.…”
Section: Damage Detection Of a Two-dimensional Frame Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3, the DFM was calibrated using a ten-story and four-bay frame building, then the DFM was applied to this frame building, which was damaged during the earthquake in Mexico on September 19, 1985 [32]. is building was previously studied by Escobar et al using a structural damage detection method called Matrix Transformation Method [33], and by Rodríguez et al using the Baseline Stiffness Method [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%