2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-017-3284-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural damage detection using finite element model updating with evolutionary algorithms: a survey

Abstract: Structural damage identification based on finite element (FE) model updating has been a research direction of increasing interest over the last decade in the mechanical, civil, aerospace, etc., engineering fields. Various studies have addressed direct, sensitivity-based, probabilistic, statistical, and iterative methods for updating FE models for structural damage identification. In contrast, evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are a type of modern method for FE model updating. Structural damage identification using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are used for the detection of system changes; underlying changes in the parameters of the physics-based model can indicate potential structural damage. This work builds upon a surge of recent work within the model updating community (Vigliotti et al, 2018;Schommer et al, 2017;Alkayem et al, 2017). The estimation in the material properties of beams, such as flexural rigidity, has been a major area of interest in such literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are used for the detection of system changes; underlying changes in the parameters of the physics-based model can indicate potential structural damage. This work builds upon a surge of recent work within the model updating community (Vigliotti et al, 2018;Schommer et al, 2017;Alkayem et al, 2017). The estimation in the material properties of beams, such as flexural rigidity, has been a major area of interest in such literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid approaches are commonplace in literature, utilising data accrued from instrumented structures to improve predictions of structural response to stimuli from these physics-based models. A commonly used example of a data/physics hybrid approach is model updating (Rocchetta et al, 2018;Grafe;Schommer et al, 2017;Alkayem et al, 2017;Vigliotti et al, 2018). In model updating, the parameters of the physics-based model are estimated using the measured response data; predicted responses of the structure are then given by the model with the estimated parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle the structural damage estimation problem, it is essential to organize the optimization problem into two main divisions: the single-objective EAs and the MOEAs. The key points to understand the differences between the two divisions can be shown in [52,53].…”
Section: Structural Damage Localization Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second subprocess is to perform the minimization task applied on the objective function. The detailed overall framework can be well observed in [52].…”
Section: Structural Damage Localization Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, vibration-based crack identification methods can be broadly classified as model-based Based on the above short review, there is a trend to transform the crack identification problem into an optimization problem, and through updating iterations to find the crack parameters minimizing the difference between measured features and calculated features, which can be classified as model updating method [36]. The model updating method has been widely used in structural damage identification [37][38][39][40], and what matters the most are the model construction and identification efficiency. For the static beam or plate, an accurate model is far more easily to obtain, which will be not the case for rotating rotors, especially when a breathing crack is there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%