2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219455414400069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Damage Detection Using Auto/Cross-Correlation Functions Under Multiple Unknown Excitations

Abstract: Traditional structural system identification and damage detection methods use vibration responses under single excitation. This paper presents an auto/cross-correlation function-based method using acceleration responses under multiple ambient white noise or impact excitations. The auto/cross-correlation functions are divided into two parts. One is associated with the structural parameters and the other with the energy of the excitation. These two parts are updated sequentially using a two-stage method. Numeric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical properties of the structural response excited by random excitation such as ambient white noise have proven to be potentially applicable for SHM and parameter identification purposes [30,31]. These properties are more important for kind of structures that are normally operating in random environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical properties of the structural response excited by random excitation such as ambient white noise have proven to be potentially applicable for SHM and parameter identification purposes [30,31]. These properties are more important for kind of structures that are normally operating in random environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the sensitivity of the normalized AMV to the local stiffness ηðR AMV =k j Þ has the expression in Eq. (29), only the lower order modal parameters will affect the value of ηðR AMV =k j Þ. Therefore, only the sensitivity of Ψ 11 Ψ 1 , Ψ 11 Ψ 2 and Ψ 21 Ψ 2 to the local stiffness k j is considered here.…”
Section: Results Of the Sensitivity Of μ Rs To The Local Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(29), the value of ηðR AMV =k j Þ is related to the sensitivity of the Hadamard product of mode shapes to the local stiffness k j , i.e. η½ðΨ r 1 Ψ s Þ=k j , the sensitivity of μ rs to the local stiffness k j , i.e.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis Of the Normalized Amv With Respect To Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were able to identify a fault signature in the planet's tooth even in a case when the amount of the available stationary vibration data was limited. Ni et al [42] considered auto-/crosscorrelation functions of multiple excitations applied to a mechanical structure. The functions were divided into two parts: the time-variant one associated with unit response functions depending on structural parameters, and the time-invariant one depending on the energy of the excitation force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%