2011
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/20/11/115010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural damage detection based on stochastic subspace identification and statistical pattern recognition: II. Experimental validation under varying temperature

Abstract: Although most vibration-based damage detection methods can acquire satisfactory verification on analytical or numerical structures, most of them may encounter problems when applied to real-world structures under varying environments. The damage detection methods that directly extract damage features from the periodically sampled dynamic time history response measurements are desirable but relevant research and field application verification are still lacking. In this second part of a two-part paper, the robust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comanducci et al conducted the vibration‐based damage detection using multivariate statistical techniques, and they used the concept of local principal component analysis, which allows one to overcome the assumption of linear correlation between output variables. Ren et al and Lin et al established a damage‐sensitive but environment‐insensitive damage index through the covariance‐driven identification based on the stochastic subspace together with the statistical pattern recognition technology; the damage index is insensitive to the temperature variation; numerical results show it can detect 20% stiffness reduction at a position near three‐fouth span of the first span of a continuous beam; moreover, the method proves capable of detecting 17% prestressed force loss in a laboratory prestressed reinforced concrete beam, as well as the damage supposed by the renewal stage change in a real box‐type reinforced concrete arch bridge under varying temperature.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Arch Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comanducci et al conducted the vibration‐based damage detection using multivariate statistical techniques, and they used the concept of local principal component analysis, which allows one to overcome the assumption of linear correlation between output variables. Ren et al and Lin et al established a damage‐sensitive but environment‐insensitive damage index through the covariance‐driven identification based on the stochastic subspace together with the statistical pattern recognition technology; the damage index is insensitive to the temperature variation; numerical results show it can detect 20% stiffness reduction at a position near three‐fouth span of the first span of a continuous beam; moreover, the method proves capable of detecting 17% prestressed force loss in a laboratory prestressed reinforced concrete beam, as well as the damage supposed by the renewal stage change in a real box‐type reinforced concrete arch bridge under varying temperature.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Arch Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, statistical hypothesis tests are carried out to judge whether new data can still be explained by the initial model [36]. Lin and Ren validate its efficiency in a rehabilitation process of a full-scale arch bridge under varying environments [37]. Döhler et al employ both the modal parameters and the statistical null space-based damage detection methods to detect the artificial progressive damage of a prestressed concrete bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discriminating reversible temperature effects from irreversible damaging effects is then required for resonance frequency monitoring. Although several techniques have been proposed for civil engineering structures such as reinforced concrete beams or buildings (Yuean & Kuok 2010;Lin et al 2011), there is currently no easy and validated method to tackle this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%