2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21082748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Damage Classification in a Jacket-Type Wind-Turbine Foundation Using Principal Component Analysis and Extreme Gradient Boosting

Abstract: Damage classification is an important topic in the development of structural health monitoring systems. When applied to wind-turbine foundations, it provides information about the state of the structure, helps in maintenance, and prevents catastrophic failures. A data-driven pattern-recognition methodology for structural damage classification was developed in this study. The proposed methodology involves several stages: (1) data acquisition, (2) data arrangement, (3) data normalization through the mean-centere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the advantages of our proposed method, classical ML algorithms including support vector machine (SVM) [34], FFT-SVM, random forest (RF) [35], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [36], and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [37] are selected to evaluate structural damage degree and improved accuracy in structural damage detection. The accuracy of KNN, RF, and XGBoost is 67.64%, 70.24%, and 75.78%, respectively, representing a low ability for recognizing structural damage detection.…”
Section: Compared With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the advantages of our proposed method, classical ML algorithms including support vector machine (SVM) [34], FFT-SVM, random forest (RF) [35], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [36], and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [37] are selected to evaluate structural damage degree and improved accuracy in structural damage detection. The accuracy of KNN, RF, and XGBoost is 67.64%, 70.24%, and 75.78%, respectively, representing a low ability for recognizing structural damage detection.…”
Section: Compared With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Location of the sensors (accelerometers) in the structure [ 19 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Damage location in the different levels of the jacket structure ( left ), [ 19 ]. Crack damage where L is the length of the bar, d = 5 mm is the crack size, and is the location of the crack in the bar ( right ).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One popular multivariate statistical method is the principal component analysis (PCA), which allows for classification of variables or individuals [9,10]. The PCA has been used in several studies related to COVID-19 [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%