2006
DOI: 10.1080/08120090500431415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural cross-section based on the Mt Isa deep seismic transect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the onset of the Mesoproterozoic large tracts of central and eastern Australia underwent a period of orogenesis (circa 1620 and 1580 Ma) (Figure 10). The orogenic history is preserved in the Arunta Inlier (Chewings Orogeny), Curnamona Province (Olarian Orogeny), Gawler Craton (Kararan Orogeny), Mount Isa Inlier (Isan Orogeny) and Georgetown Inlier (Jana Orogeny) [ Betts et al , 2006; Blenkinsop et al , 2008; Cihan et al , 2006; Cihan and Parsons , 2005; Collins et al , 1995; Daly et al , 1998; Forbes et al , 2004, 2007; Gibson et al , 2008; Giles et al , 2006b; Hand et al , 2007; MacCready , 2006a; O'Dea et al , 1997b, 2006; Potma and Betts , 2006; Rubatto et al , 2001; Vry et al , 1996] (Figures 1 and 10). The circa 1610–1560 Ma Chewings Orogeny [ Collins and Shaw , 1995] is characterized by early thin‐skinned deformation and nappe emplacement during north directed thrusting [ Teyssier et al , 1988], followed by the development of upright, shallowly plunging folds with ∼east‐west trending axial traces [ Collins and Shaw , 1995].…”
Section: End‐member Tectonic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the onset of the Mesoproterozoic large tracts of central and eastern Australia underwent a period of orogenesis (circa 1620 and 1580 Ma) (Figure 10). The orogenic history is preserved in the Arunta Inlier (Chewings Orogeny), Curnamona Province (Olarian Orogeny), Gawler Craton (Kararan Orogeny), Mount Isa Inlier (Isan Orogeny) and Georgetown Inlier (Jana Orogeny) [ Betts et al , 2006; Blenkinsop et al , 2008; Cihan et al , 2006; Cihan and Parsons , 2005; Collins et al , 1995; Daly et al , 1998; Forbes et al , 2004, 2007; Gibson et al , 2008; Giles et al , 2006b; Hand et al , 2007; MacCready , 2006a; O'Dea et al , 1997b, 2006; Potma and Betts , 2006; Rubatto et al , 2001; Vry et al , 1996] (Figures 1 and 10). The circa 1610–1560 Ma Chewings Orogeny [ Collins and Shaw , 1995] is characterized by early thin‐skinned deformation and nappe emplacement during north directed thrusting [ Teyssier et al , 1988], followed by the development of upright, shallowly plunging folds with ∼east‐west trending axial traces [ Collins and Shaw , 1995].…”
Section: End‐member Tectonic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, major uncertainties remain regarding the pre-1.8 Ga crustal architecture and nature of the basement in each of the three belts, and the nature of the tectonic setting that led to and prevailed during the amalgamation of the fold belts. Previous studies have highlighted differences in crustal architecture between the Western and Eastern Fold Belts, and various models to explain these differences have been proposed MacCready et al 1998;MacCready 2006). These include (i) the presence of a mafic underplate, or subduction of oceanic crust, beneath the Western Fold Belt, (ii) the presence of thick basaltic horizons within the supracrustal succession in the Eastern Fold Belt, or (iii) the emplacement of mafic intrusions along a decollement that once separated the Western from the Eastern Fold Belt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mount Isa terrane (Figures 1, 12) forms a crustal fragment amalgamated with the North Australian Craton during the Paleoproterozoic (Spikings et al 2001;Bierlein & Betts 2004;Betts et al 2006;Giles et al 2006;MacCready 2006). Some authors suggested that a crust of Precambrian age lies in the sub-surface of the Thomson Orogen (Henderson 1980;Murray 1990;Wellman 1990;Glen 2005;Glen et al 2006;Fergusson et al 2007aFergusson et al , 2009.…”
Section: Thomson Orogen Vs Mount Isa Terranementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Eastern Fold Belt accommodated W-directed tectonic transport above the crystalline basement rock during the Mesoproterozoic, whereas the Western Fold Belt shows E-directed deformations that affect the basement crust (O'Dea et al 1997b;Betts et al 2006;MacCready 2006). The Thomson Orogen instead is characterised by prominent W-and Sdipping structures that affect the entire crust.…”
Section: Thomson Orogen Vs Mount Isa Terranementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation